Four points about the Pakistan central contracts that don't add up

The PCB central contracts, announced on Monday, included a few decisions that seemed at odds with what Pakistan cricket fans have seen over the past few months

Danyal Rasool07-Aug-2018Much of what the PCB does, and what it took to get to that stage, is full of mystery, and guaranteed to remain that way until someone writes a tell-all book, or Younis Khan finds out and hastily summons a press conference to explain what happened and why it was a personal affront to him. The same mystery applies to the way the PCB determines who is awarded central contracts for the upcoming year, and in which of the five categories they fit. There is a method that’s supposed to look at performance over the past year, and the player’s prospects of excelling in the future, but as the method itself has never been disclosed, all we can do is analyse the conclusions it throws up.On Monday, the PCB awarded central contracts to 33 players for the upcoming year in five categories – A to E – A being the most prestigious and lucrative, and supposed to be awarded to players who are the most valuable assets to Pakistan cricket. There were no really big surprises in terms of omissions; nearly everyone who was supposed to get a central contract got one. But the categories in which certain players were placed raised questions.Does Category B actually have better players than Category A?
Test it out yourself. Pit Azhar Ali, Sarfraz Ahmed, Babar Azam, Shoaib Malik, Yasir Shah and Mohammad Amir against Fakhar Zaman, Faheem Ashraf, Shadab Khan, Hasan Ali, Asad Shafiq and Mohammad Hafeez. Can you tell which set of players were given Category A contracts? The fact there is ambiguity, and some unusual choices in each set, makes you wonder how they went about assigning categories to each player. As it turns out, the former set is Category A.Very well, you might argue. The former set has players who are regular Test cricketers for Pakistan, while Category B has players, who, while immensely exciting over the past year and a half, have largely made their name in white-ball cricket. But in that case, why on earth is Malik, who last saw a competitive red ball hurtling towards him in late 2015, included in the higher category?Is it time we got over our love affair with Mohammad Amir?
If any young cricketer wanted to be a fast bowler, they’d choose to be like Amir. With a clean run-up and quite a beautiful action, Amir looks like he’s about to get prodigious swing, or bowl a yorker that cannons into the base of middle stump. And of course, he has the hair for it all.But while spectacular performances since his comeback refuse to fade from memory – think Asia Cup against India in 2016, or more epically, the Champions Trophy final last year, he has a worse wicket-taking ratio than almost every other Pakistan bowler he plays alongside, and is ranked 28 in ODI cricket and 32 in Tests. Hasan Ali is Pakistan’s top-ranked bowler in ODI cricket, and Mohammad Abbas is in the country’s top three in Test cricket, but Amir is the only fast bowler included in the list of Category A cricketers.Is that based on hard analytics, or a teenage love affair in England eight years ago?Mohammad Abbas trapped Alastair Cook lbw•Getty ImagesWhy are Mohammad Abbas and Imam-ul-Haq in Category C?Mohammad Abbas will never be the man this Pakistan side is built around – in truth, he could go back to his old school and even today, he wouldn’t be the man they built their side around. He’s not going to be the most followed player on Instagram, or the one large screaming mobs wait outside hotels and airports to get a glimpse of or autograph from. He is a non-fussy, uncomplicated, slow fast bowler, but he does exceptionally well. He has been, by far, Pakistan’s best Test bowler since he made his debut last year, taking 42 wickets in eight games at an average of 17.69. If the PCB justifies the group of players awarded Category A contracts because of their prowess in Test cricket, then why does Abbas find himself languishing in Category C?To some extent, the same applies to Imam-ul-Haq. The exciting young left-hander made his debut against Sri Lanka in an ODI last year, scoring a hundred on debut and making the opening slot his. He now has four hundreds in his first nine ODIs and, earlier this year, displaced Sami Aslam at the top of the Test batting line-up, where he played all three Tests on Pakistan’s tour of Ireland and England. He scored a crucial, unbeaten 74 against Ireland on debut to prevent a shock defeat, and with Sami Aslam not awarded a central contract at all, Imam is set to play a lot more Test cricket over the next 12 months.When he came into the side, there were whispers of favouritism, with the 22-year old being chief selector Inzamam-ul-Haq’s nephew. But now that he’s established himself as an ODI and Test opener, isn’t there a case to be made that he’s been treated slightly harshly?Why is Asif Ali all the way down in Category D?The wider cricket world may not have known who Asif Ali was until the Pakistan Super League this year, but since then, he has to be defined as the success story of PSL 2018. Called up to make his international debut barely a week after helping Islamabad seal the title, he’s already made his name in the limited-overs side as a lower-order power hitter. He hasn’t missed a single white-ball game for Pakistan since, averaging 40 at a strike rate of nearly 160 in ten T20Is. In ODIs, he’s been even better, with an average of 57 and a strike rate over 180 from five games.Making a career in international cricket is all about grasping the chances you’re offered, and there isn’t much more Asif could have done to make a lower-order spot in the side his. Already, it seems almost inconceivable he won’t go to the World Cup, and in truth he will probably start every game Pakistan play there. For a player of that profile, then, to be placed in Category D seems quite odd, especially when a player like Imad Wasim, who hasn’t played for Pakistan at all this year, is in a higher category (C). Similarly, Haris Sohail, who struggled to get into the Pakistan side while Asif was already in it over the past few months, is in a higher category too.What is that method the PCB use again?

The Achilles heel of England's World Cup hopes

The T20 series offered England hope they can work out Kuldeep Yadav but the effectiveness of wristspin counters their preferred route of flat one-day pitches

George Dobell at Trent Bridge12-Jul-20182:00

Harmison: Kohli’s captaincy sustained pressure for Kuldeep

“And we’ll go on getting bad results…”Jimmy Hill wasn’t talking about England’s cricket team when he made that now famous remark – it is sampled in the song for those who have been living on the moon in recent days – but it fits pretty well anyway.England have a long-standing and serious issue when confronted by quality spin bowling. It has, in recent times, cost them dearly in the Caribbean, Bangladesh, India, Sri Lanka and the UAE. And now there seems to be every chance it could derail their World Cup hopes.Even here at Trent Bridge, on what might be considered the spiritual home of England’s ODI resurgence – it has been here that they have twice set world record ODI totals – they were exposed by that weakness once more.To be fair, Kuldeep Yadav’s skill is rare and precious. There are few, if any, left-arm wristspinners on the county circuit (Akhil Patel, the brother of Samit, played 2nd XI cricket for Derbyshire as recently as last year but hasn’t played a first-class game since 2011, while Jake Lintott played one T20 match for Hampshire last year) so the challenge offered by Kuldeep is unusual. The angles, the drift, the turn – all will require adjustment time and experience. And that is even before we acknowledge that he has excellent control and found, at times, sharp turn on a perfectly good surface on which other spinners found little assistance. He looks a fine bowler.He is also a bowler who threatens to undermine England’s whole ODI method. For such bowlers can unlock even the best batting tracks – the very quickest fast bowlers might be able to do the same thing – which means there is an Achilles heel in England’s approach. No longer can they simply prepare excellent batting surfaces and back their batsmen to drown their opposition in big hitting. They suddenly have a vulnerability.It’s not impossible that, by the end of this English summer, Kuldeep will have lost his potency. Something similar happened with Laxman Sivaramakrishnan in 1984-85. After claiming six wickets in each innings of the first Test of that series against England (in Mumbai) to help India to victory, he gradually became less potent as the batsmen learned to pick – or at least negate – his leg-spin. After 12 wickets in that first Test, he claimed seven in the second and then just four more in the next three Tests at a cost of over 100 apiece as England fought back to win the series. The career trajectories of Paul Adams – another left-arm wristspinner – and Ajantha Mendis – who was more of an offspinner with an almost unique action – were similar.Those examples should give England hope. It shows that, if they give themselves time, the clouds of mystery part and batting against Kuldeep become easier. And although you could equally look at the example of Shane Warne or Murali – bowlers who tormented England (and many other teams, to be fair) throughout their careers – Kuldeep is significantly slower than most contemporary spinners (his average pace here was 48.1 mph), which might, in time, prove an issue.Ben Stokes takes a break between overs•Getty ImagesThere were signs that England were learning to play him during the T20 series. After his match-winning haul in the first game at Old Trafford where he claimed 5 for 24, England played him much better in the second match in Cardiff when he went wicketless. Concluding that he had, in essence, three deliveries – a leg-break that turns into the right-hander, a googly that turns away and a much quicker delivery that goes straight but at a pace of around 66mph – they resolved that, if they couldn’t pick him out of the hand, they could play back more often and adjust off the pitch.Kuldeep – and his captain – responded brilliantly here. By posting a leg slip, they prevented England from either attempting to sweep or simply turning the leg-break behind square into the leg side. It robbed them of both a defensive and run-scoring option. Apparently reluctant to come down the wicket, it left them almost strokeless.Might England accept struggling against Kuldeep for a Test or two this summer if it means they are familiar with him by the time the World Cup comes round? Whatever the answer, there is, perhaps, a case for India hiding him from England again until the Test series or, perhaps, the World Cup. Yes, there is ample footage of him already out there. But there isn’t much evidence to suggest England have benefitted from that footage so far. It might be relevant, too, that he didn’t bowl one of his quicker deliveries in this match. He might, already, be keeping a couple of secrets up his sleeve.It would be a mistake to dismiss this experience against an unusual bowler as an aberration, though. There have been too many examples against spinners of all varieties to suggest Kuldeep has a unique ability to trouble England. Remember Mehedi Hasan (the offspinner who derailed England in Bangladesh), Lloyd Pope (the legspinner who derailed England U19 in New Zealand, or Jomel Warrican (the left-arm spinner who derailed England Lions in the Caribbean). Even here, Suresh Raina – admittedly benefitting from the inroads made by Kuldeep – delivered 14 dot ball in his 18 deliveries. It’s not one style or one surface that bothers England. It’s good spin bowling.So, what can England learn from the past? Well, on that 1984-85 tour of India they finally found a way to combat Sivaramakrishnan. But that England team contained batmen such as Mike Gatting, David Gower, Graeme Fowler and Tim Robinson (one of the umpires in this match) who had spent their formative years learning their trade in a county game that seemed to value spin bowling far more that it does presently.And that brings us back where we started. Conditions in English cricket will generally mean that young players are exposed less to spin bowling than they are to seam and swing. It may well always be an area of potential weakness.But, over the last decade or so, the situation has deteriorated. As older, specialist spinners have been squeezed out of the game and younger, all-rounders have focused on white-ball skills, as counties have struggled to provide opportunities for their talented young spinners in first-class cricket, as surfaces and fixtures lists and bat sizes and boundaries have all conspired against the spinner, the art has suffered in England.There is talent out there among young spinners, for sure, but it struggles for opportunity. And, as a result, young batsmen grow up without the skills or coping strategies to know how to combat such bowling. Playing The 100 in a window in high summer will make it even worse.England’s long-term strategy – prioritising white-ball cricket in the belief that success in that format will bring in a new audience and new riches – could, ironically, be undermined by their lack of investment in the first-class game. And no amount of off-field spin – which, to be fair, English cricket is much better at – will change that.

Benny Howell: Gloucestershire's magical mystery man

The story of a lad who overcame ADHD to become an unclassifiable bowler who’s one of the world’s best in T20

Jarrod Kimber25-Jul-2018Benny Howell is different. He knows it and his hair shows it. It’s a faux hawk in his natural colour, but with a bleached blond streak on one side of the peak, kind of in the crease where the mohawk meets his closely shaved head. Like it’s supposed to be one thing and ended up another.That is what Howell is. He’s supposed to be a batsman who bowled a bit of medium pace. Instead, he’s perhaps the most interesting bowler in the world: a medium-paced spinning pitcher.”I’m a bit different than a normal bloke. I’m a bit everywhere.”***In 2005, Howell made 66 for Hampshire 2nds as a 16-year-old. It took him five years to make the 1st XI. He was an opener and Hampshire had a top order of Jimmy Adams, Michael Carberry, John Crawley, Michael Lumb and Kevin Pietersen.There were no 1st XI games for the first two seasons. In his third season, in 2010, he played two List A games. The next season he played regularly. He even made his first-class debut, a 71 as opener after following on.Howell played 13 T20 and 13 List A matches for Hampshire. He didn’t bowl much in the List A games, but he averaged 44 with a strike rate of 92. In the T20s he floated around the lower middle-order, and with limited opportunity averaged 30 with the bat and 18 with the ball. At the end of that season they let him go.”I made a few mistakes, I had a few issues with time,” he remembered. “It was the end of the season. I decided to go on holiday without asking the coaches. I was getting frustrated with not playing, so I was probably lashing out a bit. At the time I didn’t think it was wrong.”With a record like his, it should have been easy for Howell to find another team. But the county rumour mill said he was challenging and more trouble than he was worth.In the 2011 off-season Dave Fulton, a former Kent captain, and an agent at the time, took on Howell to help him find a new county. No one showed much interest. Fulton called John Bracewell, then coach of Gloucestershire, and they agreed that if Howell turned up for pre-season, he’d get a trial. Howell would have to cut his contract with Melbourne grade cricket team Essendon, which he was willing to do.The only problem was that every call Fulton put in to Bracewell after Howell had booked to come home early went unanswered. Howell struggled with the uncertainty. “My head wasn’t great then. Before that I was pretty confident I was going to get somewhere. It was pretty obnoxious of me. They bred us in Hampshire to be confident.”

The easy thing for Howell would have been to rely on his batting, and chip in a few overs when circumstances called. He chose to make himself into a kind of bowler who hadn’t existed before

Fulton came up with another plan. In March 2012 he drove to Southampton to pick up Howell and took him to Oxford, where Gloucestershire were playing a practice game.”We get there, and I see John Bracewell doing some paperwork sitting on the bench,” Fulton remembered. “Gloucestershire are batting, so I pick the phone up to call, and I see him pick the phone up, think for a bit, and then put the phone down and carry on with his paperwork. So I walk around the ground and say ‘Hello John.'”‘Oh hello Fults, you just phoned me?'”‘I think we both know I did.'”Bracewell admitted that since their first call, he’d found out the county had no money.”It’s okay, he’ll play for nothing,” Fulton said. “He’ll crash on someone’s floor. He just wants an opportunity.”Howell spoke up. “I want to play for Gloucester, I feel I’m good enough. Will you give me a go?”Bracewell did.Fulton was nervous before Howell’s first game.”You become like Jerry Maguire, where you’re watching it and going ‘Come on’, and his first game in the 2nds he got nought and one, and you go ‘Grrrr.'”Howell felt worse. “I didn’t know where to go from there. I was pretty down.”He opened in the next game against Surrey and made 207 not out. He never had to sleep on anyone’s floor again, and by July he had a contract.***These days when bowlers warm up, coaches stand behind the rubber stumps with a baseball glove. For coaches, most bowlers in the world are straightforward. Occasionally on practice pitches with inconsistent bounce, balls get past them, and other times the ball will hit the stump and veer off. Howell isn’t a straightforward bowler.Today the coach is standing two metres back from the stumps and some balls bounce twice, others kick up, and one just seems to roll after pitching. And Howell is so accurate he hits the stumps more than most. It feels for a whole session that the coach doesn’t take one cleanly. And it isn’t as if the coach hasn’t seen slower balls. It’s Ian Harvey, possibly the best deliverer of slower balls in the ’90s.To confuse someone as experienced as Harvey, you can’t bowl normal. Howell could have been a standard medium-pacer with a few cutters and a back-of-the-hand slower ball – a poor man’s Harvey. But he chose something else, and it’s because of baseball.Howell (right) left Melbourne grade-cricket side Essendon for Gloucestershire, saying he’d play for free and sleep on people’s floors if needed•Harry Trump/Getty ImagesOn holiday in America a few years ago, Howell went to a Miami Marlins v Philadelphia Phillies game. He became obsessed with the duel between pitcher and batter. When he went back to one of his regular stints in Melbourne district cricket, he decided to play baseball for Malvern Braves, a small amateur club. He played centerfield to start, and would come in as a relief pitcher towards the end. It changed everything.”I loved the idea of a knuckleball, a curveball, so I played around with it. I thought, why not use it in cricket? No one was using it [the knuckleball]. That’s when my bowling took off.”The knuckleball became my main change-up. It was doing things that people hadn’t seen before.”This was before Andrew Tye started taking over the world. Until then, Howell had been a batsman; these deliveries turned him into a white-ball allrounder.***Howell doesn’t have just a knuckleball, he has one he rolls off the end of his thumb, making it rotate . Another is a wobble ball, and one that sometimes acts like an in- or outswinger.”I was looking at all the clips of the different pitchers. I liked the look of a screwball, the way it drifts in, like a legcutter, but sometimes skids on, or it might hold. Instead of bowling just a standard offcutter, which I don’t think is that valuable these days, I try to hold it like an offspinner and bowl offspin.”The commentators are always saying I bowl cutters – no, I don’t. I also bowl barrel balls [which is when an offspinner bowls around the side: a ball might skid on or hold].”As I was going on, I was seeing what works, because obviously a few pitches don’t work because the ball has to bounce. And the cricket ball doesn’t do as much as a baseball in the air. And then I started working out how to hold knuckleballs differently, how to drift the right way.”The majority of slower balls in cricket are offcutters, back-of-the-hand, or split-fingered. Howell uses none of these. He’s working on a back-of-the-hand slower ball, but even then it’s something different. It sounds like Abdul Qadir’s great finger wrong’un, where instead of coming out from the palm of the hand, it is flicked out quickly from between the thumb and index finger.Baseball doesn’t have spinners. But they do talk about spin. They measure baseball pitches with a spin rate: imparting spin allows them to move the ball more in the air. This is the Magnus effect – how balls from spinners drift and drop.Baseball techniques have been used in cricket before. Fred Spofforth studied baseball to master his swerve. Glenn McGrath, over 100 years later, had a lot of success with the split-finger slower ball – baseball’s splitter.But the reason Howell is using them is also because of how similar T20 is to baseball. Batsmen now come harder more often, and working the ball around is far less important than hitting it for six. A wicket is not valued as much in T20 as in longer forms. The contest now is much closer to the kill-or-be-killed nature of baseball.

It feels like I have a million thoughts going on in my head. I can’t put a mark on what I am confused about. It just feels like everything is a bit muddled, jumbled up in my brain

The primary contest has always been the same: if you can consistently deceive the batter, you’ll be more successful. In baseball they focus on the curve of these variation pitches as much as on the lack of pace. In cricket, Howell recently told the podcast, “we talk too much about the changing speed. It’s actually about the movement of slower balls as well”.If you look at great slower-ball bowlers, they often beat batsmen through dip, or eventually, spin. Lasith Malinga’s economy for full tosses was better than when most bowlers landed the ball because many of his full tosses were slower balls with incredible late dip. (Howell has experimented with Malinga’s low-arm action, because of course he has.) His pace doesn’t change as much as that of others, but he’s trying to beat you with movement, bounce and drop.Howell loved baseball so much, he thought about quitting cricket and trying to make it in the minor leagues. Many cricketers are obsessed with baseball. When Howell talks about it, he often mixes its terms up with those of cricket. He is a pitching obsessive. Recently he claimed to the that he has 50 slower balls. Fifty – from those that are match-ready to those he is experimenting with on his own.He is mostly referred to as a medium – or generously – a medium-fast seamer. He’s not that at all. “I call myself more of a spinner. I wanted to push myself to be a bit different.”He’s not a spinner either. He’s different.****”I’m a bit different than a normal bloke. I’m a bit everywhere”.There’s a nervous energy to Howell when he speaks, like he’s not sure if he has said the right thing but really hopes he has. In cricket, people gossip a lot and they say he has autism. It’s not true, but these things stick.In 2015, as England were getting dumped out of the World Cup, Howell tweeted: “Right time to perform for @Gloscricket as there is an @ECB_cricket place to be had.” The tweet only got five retweets and 11 likes, though if you ask around, people in the game noted it.”Everyone thinks those things, but others don’t act on every single emotion they have. That is what I have worked on to control. When I was a kid, I was diagnosed with ADHD, and then I sort of forgot about it. And then at the end of [the] Hampshire [stint], I was diagnosed with depression, but I didn’t feel like it was depression, I just felt confused. So I read a few things, and ADHD sounded about right, because I was doing things that are impulsive, I was getting confused, not thinking straight. I would say things without even thinking about it.”When he was at Gloucestershire he was diagnosed officially and sought help. “Medication, and actually more meditation, in fact. I do a lot of meditating to help me to be a bit more clearer, and not so jumpy on each sort of thought I have.”It feels like I have a million thoughts going on in my head. I can’t put a mark on what I am confused about. It just feels like everything is a bit muddled, jumbled up in my brain.”Selling the drama: Howell unfurls one of his celebrations•Getty ImagesThere are many athletes around the world with ADHD, including Michael Phelps. Some have talked about it as something to overcome and others as something that helps them. Either way, it certainly gives these athletes a point of difference in how they view the world and sport.It’s very hard to be an innovator in professional sport because everyone has arrived at the top level doing things the one way. In basketball the underhand free throw is far more accurate than the standard way, yet players are embarrassed to try it. The broomstick putter and metal drivers in golf were not instantly taken up, despite huge advantages. The easy thing for Howell would have been to rely on his batting, and chip in a few overs when circumstances called. He chose to make himself into a kind of bowler who hadn’t existed before.”I think if I didn’t have ADHD I wouldn’t have experimented with all my variations. I jump on things, I’m impulsive. But it’s helped my game.”I don’t think people knew what I was doing for a couple of years, maybe until a year or two ago. I was just having fun. People thought I was a bit crazy.”***In 2013 he took T20 wickets at an average of 23 and an economy of 7.24. In 2014 the average was 19.60, the economy 7.24; the next year, 22.17 and 7.25; then 17.44 and 6.65; and last year, 14.88 and 5.95 (all but six matches in the Blast).Howell has got better the teams have seen him. Even as teams have scored less off him, he continues to take wickets. Unlike players with similar records, like Sunil Narine and Rashid Khan, teams don’t really play around him and look for singles. Howell thinks they are starting to do that, but he has a theory on why they haven’t so far. “There is still an element of ‘he’s a medium-pacer, we should try and take him down’, which is fair enough, but it comes to my advantage.”People kill to face gentle medium pace. Medium-pace bowlers have been dying a slow-medium death in cricket since the war. Fast bowlers are in every team, so there are few medium-fast bowlers at the top level, let alone medium. Those who are medium-paced are almost never specialists. Fewer still are front-line bowlers.That is a big reason Howell has a career. Now, if he batted 11 and couldn’t physically hold a bat in his hands, he’d still be close to the first name on Gloucestershire’s team sheet.There are a growing number of slower-bowling specialists in T20. Tye is their current rock star, but Dwayne Bravo is their spiritual leader. In the last three years, Bravo, Tye and Thisara Perera are first, third and 11th on the T20 wickets list. These three medium-fast bowlers (according to their ESPNcricinfo profiles) are three of the best wicket-takers in the world. But they are quicker than Howell – over 80mph and sometimes over 85. Howell would be lucky to break 75mph – he thinks high 70s. The others can bowl quick yorkers, surprise bouncers; Howell can do neither. He’s left with his change-ups and very friendly pace.Cricket used to have hybrid bowlers like Sydney Barnes, who some called a seamer and some a spinner. But since Derek Underwood, there has been no one even kind of similar to that. Howell is not sure what bowler he’s similar to.

Recently Howell claimed that he has 50 slower balls. Fifty – from those that are match-ready to those he is experimenting with on his own

“Ian Harvey, maybe, or there was a guy from New Zealand.” (He means Chris Harris.) Harvey was a standard medium-fast, quicker than Howell, with great slower balls, and Harris bowled legcutters. Howell’s not like them.***A former bowler was recently contracted by his board to look at some bowling prospects for all formats. Of the four, he liked two. The board told him they were both too slow and then asked what he thought of the others. He said they weren’t much good but they were fast. The board went with the faster bowlers.The eye test is still how most cricketers worldwide are picked. How do they ?Tye looks better than Howell because he’s taller, stronger, quicker, and in cricket parlance, hits the deck hard. He also plays in the BBL, a higher-quality league. That means people are willing to take a risk on him for international cricket, the IPL, and now, other competitions.One of those competitions is the Blast, where Tye played alongside Howell for Gloucestershire. Tye played 14 games in which both took a wicket every 16 balls (which is incredible). But Tye’s smart economy is 8.6 and Howell’s is 6.1. It is great, but it doesn’t mean Howell’s numbers will translate to overseas leagues.The only other league Howell has played in was the BPL. He travelled there against the direct advice of the PCA in 2016 because it was his first big shot. In two seasons he has played six games (curiously only one in the second season). In those games, he averaged 20 and his smart economy was 5.28.The other problem is how little he’s seen. He’s not in a big-market team and Blast games are rarely televised. This year his team had two televised games, the first of which was played when England were facing Croatia in the football World Cup semi-final. At times he plays Royal London (50-over) matches that are on TV as well, but his bowling isn’t as good there.Still, England has one of cricket’s most professional scouting networks. And Howell has been the best T20 bowler in England for five years. He has taken the second most wickets in the last five years of the Blast, has the seventh-best economy rate, and takes a wicket every 16 balls. For three out of the last six seasons, the Blast has had the highest run rate among the world’s T20 leagues, so Howell’s economy is impressive. He has bowled to some decent batsmen – Chris Gayle, Colin Ingram, Jesse Ryder, Eoin Morgan, Andre Russell, Kumar Sangakkara, Jason Roy, Richard Levi, Dwayne Bravo, Aaron Finch, Brendon McCullum, Sunil Narine, David Miller, Corey Anderson. He has taken Ravi Bopara three times in nine games, and Sam Billings three times in seven. But England haven’t come calling.”I’m not shocked I haven’t been picked up, but I am disappointed,” he said. “I’ve never played Lions. I know when they were looking at the T20 friendlies last year, I was one of the names that came up. Apparently my slower balls weren’t too different when they were looking through speed analysis. That’s what I’ve heard – not sure how true that is. They still see me as not quick enough – a seamer with change-ups – and they think at international level I’ll get hit.”If that is true, it’s a massive misunderstanding of what Howell does. If anyone deserves a chance to get hit at international level, it’s him.***Thisara Perera bowls in the Powerplay for Gloucestershire at Uxbridge. It’s clear that although Perera is a slower-ball bowler – especially at the death – he’s still more than quick enough. Howell replaces Perera and the keeper comes straight up to the stumps.Howell has two first-class hundreds, but now, even if his batting was rubbish, he’d be close to being the first name on Gloucestershire’s team sheet•Getty ImagesLike for spinners the world over, Howell’s first over is the one straight after the Powerplay ends. He’s wearing the number 13. His first ball is full and straight and for all his alternative methods, he likes the “if you miss, I hit” mantra. They steal a second run off his first ball, and Howell gets struck on the fingers from the throw. There’s just a touch of the prima donna about his reaction. The over is a collection of balls hit hard to fielders and mishits that bobble off the bat safely.Howell’s wickets are off floating balls that come off the bat impossibly slowly and loop up in the air. There are no attacking fielders for one of the best T20 wicket-takers – everyone is back on the edge of the circle or boundary. At long-on, a mishit by John Simpson that never looks like going over the rope is taken. Howell seems to have a pre-planned wicket celebration and then adds a second one that doesn’t quite match. Both of them seem to be from ’80s comedy movies no one can remember.His next ball is to Dwayne Bravo, who pushes nervously back down the wicket. It should be stopped, but as Howell tries, he sort of folds over on himself. At first it doesn’t look like a significant problem and he gets up and walks back to his mark, but his limp gets worse. He stops and stretches before continuing to walk, limping again, starting and stopping, limping a few times. It’s long and dramatic. Everyone knows he won’t be able to bowl, but Howell keeps trying to get himself right, trying to prove he can overcome whatever it is. It’s a real injury, and he’ll be out for a couple of weeks.Howell has only bowled 11 balls, but in that time he has bamboozled top-order players, shown his hair to the crowd, covered the ball up like it’s a state secret, wrung his hands like a finger has been detached, celebrated a wicket with at least one, if not two, pre-planned celebrations, and then limped around one ball after his wicket. It has been dramatic, captivating and very different.***Slower balls lose their effectiveness. Cutters are smashed out of parks in club cricket now. Players see a ball coming above their eyeline and know it’s a back-of-the-hand slower ball. You see bowlers have a good season or year, when the slower balls can’t be picked, before struggling for a while when word gets around on how to pick them.Howell has got better the more people have faced him; he doesn’t have a few slower balls, he has a never-ending collection of deliveries to confuse batsmen, all while struggling with his own confusion.When you ask him about his ADHD, he says: “If you could imagine an old room full of stuff that hasn’t been used in 20 years, cobwebs, dust, things everywhere, that’s what my brain was. I was like that, a bit strange, a bit different.”It’s an answer you can tell he has used before. He was asked a question, and he went into that old room full of stuff and came out with the exact right answer for this situation. The same old room of stuff that’s also full of 50 slower balls.Benny Howell is a bit different from a normal cricketer. He’s a different bowler from almost everyone in T20.

'CoA have lost sight of their mandate' – BCCI acting secretary Amitabh Choudhary

The BCCI’s acting secretary was responding to comments by CoA chief Vinod Rai who has accused office bearers of obstructing change within the board

Interview by Sidharth Monga04-Aug-2018The Committee of Administrators (CoA) has failed at implementing the Lodha Committee reforms and, along the way, lost sight of its mandate. That is the withering assessment of BCCI acting secretary Amitabh Choudhary about the CoA’s 18 months in charge.The CoA was appointed by the Supreme Court and tasked with not only bringing in reforms in the BCCI but also to supervise day-to-day board activities. Instead, significant reforms are yet to be put in place, and the Court has reserved its final order on certain key reforms, which has led to expectations that the Lodha reforms might face significant alteration.Choudhary, speaking to ESPNcricinfo, was responding to comments by CoA chief Vinod Rai who has accused office bearers, such as Choudhary himself, of obstructing change and the members of exploiting “loopholes” in the court order.The view the CoA seems to hold is that the office bearers have been obstructionist instead of cooperative. Can you personally say you have cooperated to the best of your ability in the implementation of reforms?I had given an undertaking to the honourable Supreme Court that I was for reforms, and would cooperate in implementation. Have a look at the so-called status reports. The same status reports were all praise for me – the fourth in particular – that I was cooperating and trying my best. So on and so forth. Had that not been the fact, why did I, in the month of February, persuade these 13 states to accept the reforms? They stood persuaded barring two or three points, which liberty the honourable court itself had granted, which they mentioned. I forwarded the opinions and suggestions of these 13 states. Was I not cooperating with the reforms? My job was to cooperate, I had given that undertaking. But I am not there to cooperate with any individual. Any mistakes on that, I am sorry to say, I am not there for that.But the individual has contended that the states did not come forward with any suggestions for the draft constitution.This is untruth, because I am a signatory as secretary of the BCCI to the written statements of 13 full members of BCCI, including the pillar of Indian cricket, Mumbai, Ranji champions Vidarbha and Full Members from each and every zone.Mr Rai says the court has taken an unduly long time and that’s why the impasse. So the entire fault lies with the system which means either the Supreme Court or the office bearers or the BCCI? How can anyone talk about Supreme Court in such manner? He says the argument to take off the cooling-off period is untenable but on July 5, the honourable Supreme Court heard the matter, spoke on the subject and thereafter said we reserve our judgement. So the honorary Supreme Court is seized with the matter, is considering a view on the matter, taking a view on the matter. How is he stating his view? On a subject that Supreme Court is taking a view, he has no right to take a view.Vinod Rai, the former Comptroller and Auditor General of India, who is on the Supreme-Court appointed interim panel to oversee the BCCI•Associated PressMr Rai has also spoken about your daily allowances, USD 750 for foreign tours, which in his view is a vested interest and in effect takes away your honorary status.Are our allowances in accordance with rules as they are today in the BCCI? If they are, then so be it. If you are comparing to those of the players, you are conveniently forgetting the fact that the players for playing these matches – and I am not even remotely referring to sponsorships – are getting match fees apart from annual central contracts. This DA that Mr Rai is quoting and juxtaposing with that of the office bearers is unfair.Also this TA-DA is in accordance with the amount cleared by Mr Rai himself on June 22, 2018.But he is saying the amount is unreasonableFair enough. Make it reasonable, through due processes. I am all for that. But you must find out what DA I was drawing at the time of the fourth status report and what I am drawing now. It hasn’t changed. Why has this issue come up suddenly?You said you were there to co-operate with the reforms and not with an individual. It was going fine as you say until the fourth status report. What went wrong after that?I began to block appointments made through rank opaque processes. One of Priya Gupta (GM, marketing) and the other of Ajit Singh (head of ACSU). Nobody knew what the processes were, what the selection panel were, when the selections were done. We were just presented with a that A has been selected, B has been selected, and when some queries were raised, we were treated as if we were obstructionists. And even in overlooking our objections, they were not consistent: Ajit Singh’s appointment was authenticated by the CEO despite my refusal, but Priya Gupta has been left out in the cold. He should have been truthful to both. Mr Rai selected both Priya Gupta and Ajit Singh. Both were rejected by me. Both should have been appointed by the CEO. Only one was.The BCCI officials at the IPL opening ceremony•BCCIDid disagreements also extend to cricketing matters?Yes. Take day-night Test cricket, for example. The issue is absolutely clear. It had to be brought to the stakeholders. Who are the stakeholders? Players. Public. Visiting team. Broadcasters. Also those who work for cricket, those who select the team. Everyone had been consulted, and I had put it on record. I didn’t only speak to the head coach, I told him don’t take a decision in a hurry. You take two days, and then send me an email about your view on the subject, incorporating the players’ views. He said they were okay with it as long as we had only one session under lights. But now the plan stands cancelled because apparently the team doesn’t want it. Nobody else has shown me anything in black and white from the head coach. Remember the fact that apart from Bangladesh, India is the only country which has still not started playing day-night Test cricket. Indian cricket team as represented by the head coach was ready, the opposition was ready, the broadcaster was ready. Nobody has shown me an on-the-record refusal from the team because apparently none exists.You also didn’t sign the new player contracts.We knew nothing about them. To assign categories to different players is the job of the selectors. They did not meet. I should know because I am the convenor of the selection committee. Nor was I informed of the criteria of the contracts. That is why I didn’t sign the contracts. I said come what way I will not sign. It is only after the general body agreed to them in the June 20 meeting that I signed.They tried to intimidate me in the Priya Gupta case but I stood my ground. I said I will appear personally in the Supreme Court, and argue against it.There seems to be a general dislike for Mr Rai and the CoA because they have begun to rule on the day-to-day matters. Mr Rai’s counter always has been that their mandate was to supervise the functioning of the board until the reforms were implemented.Do you accept the fact that a district magistrate supervises affairs of the district? If the answer is yes, do tell me when the DM goes to a district, does he frame new laws or work under the laws that exist? He doesn’t have the mandate from the Supreme Court to change rules except for these reforms.The CoA’s opinion of the office bearers is known now. How do you rate the way the CoA has gone about implementing the reforms, and also have they stuck to their mandate?They have lost sight of the mandate. Sorry, they had lost sight of the mandate. Now the time is over. That is why they failed. For the simple reason that if they had focused on the mandate, they would have at least travelled the distance that I could travel with the members wherein I persuaded 13 Full Members to accept the reforms only exercising slight discretion with regards to the July 24 2017 order where some liberty had been granted by the honourable Supreme Court. They have not been able to persuade one single member of the BCCI.

Assured Ben Foakes shuns 'risky' approach to set up England

Old-fashioned Test innings from inexperienced duo Ben Foakes and Sam Curran provided an antidote for England’s top-order failings

George Dobell in Galle06-Nov-2018It took a couple of new boys to show the old ones how to do it.After a morning session in which England’s batsmen had squandered first use of a surface on which run-scoring is likely to become harder, it took Ben Foakes – on debut – and Sam Curran – aged 20 – to provide the calm heads and common sense required to drag England back into this contest.Foakes, in particular, showed his top-order colleagues how it should be done with an innings that spoke of wonderful composure and assurance. While those above him fell attempting to force the pace of the game, Foakes was content to bide his time and wait for the loose ball. So while three of the top four had strikes rates of 75 or more, Foakes was happy to take 40 balls to score his first seven runs. And while England’s top order thrashed 10 fours in the game’s first 10 overs, Foakes was happy to register just six in his 68 overs at the crease.All tour, England have spoken of the need to play with “courage” and take “risks”. But as Joe Root skipped down the pitch and yorked himself, Keaton Jennings missed a cut that was far too close to him and Ben Stokes was bowled round his legs attempting a delicate lap-sweep, it was hard to wish there wasn’t just a little more talk of “patience” and “discipline” and rather less of the bravado.For we are hardly in uncharted territory here. This England team has lived and, very often, died by the sword in recent years. And, despite the mountain of evidence that suggests it is a ploy that will meet with limited success at Test level, they show little sign of changing.This is, after all, the team that has lost ten wickets in a session three times in the last two years (something that never happened between 1936 and 2016) and here saw four of their top five bowled in the first-innings of a Test for the first time this century. They attacked 30% of the deliveries they faced before lunch – a record, according to CricViz, for England in Tests in Asia since such data started being compiled in 2006 – with Root responding to his team’s predicament (they were two down after 75 minutes) by advancing and attempting to hit Rangana Herath over the top. Courageous? Maybe. Sensible? Not really.Rain removed spinners’ advantage – Dliruwan

As is often the case on this new generation of Sri Lankan tracks, the new ball is spinning more than the old one, said Dilruwan Perera, who took 4 for 70 on day one.
“The wicket was covered for two days before the match because of the rain, and I think that took away the usual advantage the spinners have here,” he said. “The wicket spun when the ball was new, but when it got older, it just became slower.”
He also was of the view that the pitch for this Test is better for batting than the surfaces generally encountered at Galle. He believed it is unlike the pitch on which the most-recent Test at this venue, was played – that game, against South Africa, lasted only two-and-a-half days.
“I get the feeling that this Galle Test last four or five days. It is a good wicket and I don’t think it will deteriorate that much.”

In Foakes we saw the antidote. He played straight, he played each delivery on its merits and he didn’t go searching for the ‘four’ ball. He trusted his defence – you wonder if some of those top-order colleagues do so – and talked, instead of “courage,” of “grinding” and “nurdling”. He fought off a sustained attack of cramp towards stumps and resumes, on day two, within 13 runs of becoming just the second England wicketkeeper to make a century on Test debut. Matt Prior was the other.Is it relevant that Foakes was on debut? You would hope not. But you do wonder if all the talk of “courage” and “risk” and “aggression” seeps into the mindset of this squad over time and through exposure. Foakes is untainted by such complications – he actually declined the offer of a Lions tour this winter in the belief that an extended break would do him more good; he had just returned from a “lads’ trip” to Lisbon when he was called-up – and played good, old-fashioned cricket without the testosterone that seems to govern so much of England’s batting in all formats.That’s not the say the England system hasn’t contributed to Foakes’ success. He has been part of the “pathway” for a decade and this is, in one way or another, his sixth trip to Sri Lanka to play cricket, including various Lions tours and a placement with Colts, a club in Colombo. Trevor Bayliss has wanted him involved – here, in particular – for some time and he came into the match with a first-class average of 40.64. This is not, despite Foakes’ late call-up, a complete shock.”It definitely helped me,” he said of his experience in Sri Lanka. “I got to learn a little bit about Dilruwan Perera and Akila Dananjaya [who also played for Colts]. And the thing you can’t really prepare for is the heat, unless you’ve done it. I think playing in this sort of heat a few times really helped.”Bruce French deserves praise, too. While there is limited evidence of much improvement among batsmen and bowlers in the England environment, the improvement in keepers – think of Prior or Jonny Bairstow – is marked. French, England’s long-term wicketkeeping coach, struggled to hold back the tears when he awarded Foakes his Test cap and deserves recognition for his part in his development.Ben Foakes brought up his maiden Test fifty•Getty ImagesFoakes has though, given the England management quite a headache ahead of the Kandy Test. With Bairstow expected to be fit to play, they will be forced to make a tricky selection. Foakes, like Bairstow and Jos Buttler and Stokes and Moeen Ali, all look at their best in the middle-order, but something – or somebody – really has to give.That somebody here was, as ever, Moeen. Having been told he definitely wouldn’t be batting at No. 3 little more than a week ago, he came into this game after one warm-up innings when he batted at No. 7. There’s no defending his failure to keep out a pretty regulation delivery that was angled in from around the stumps, but England sure do mess him around.Bayliss said, earlier in the week, that both Moeen and Stokes were in the side for their batting, with their bowling considered a bonus. But Moeen now averages 31.87 with the bat in Test cricket and Stokes 33.56: they are not stats that would be considered sufficient for specialist batsmen.Foakes defended England’s approach after play. Arguing that, in the first session, the ball gripped on a slightly tacky surface, he suggested that, had they allowed the bowlers to settle into a length, they could have been rendered both strokeless and defenceless.”In that first session the amount the ball stuck and turned, if we hadn’t been aggressive, we could have been 30 for four or five.” Foakes said. “The guys went about it really well. The way Keaton Jennings played especially, taking the game to them and throwing them off their lengths, worked quite well.”Maybe. But England were again bailed out by the depth of their batting. Curran, patient between poor balls but merciless when they arrived, again contributed well but will be disappointed with the attempted heave that ended his innings. Adil Rashid also swung merrily for a while but, as a No. 9, has more licence to do so. The top-order have to take more responsibility. Test batting is about more than aggression. It has to encompass patience and restraint, too.

Smart Stats – Why Kieron Pollard's 46* was nearly as impactful as Alzarri Joseph's six-for

And how costly was Rashid Khan’s dropped catch when Pollard was batting on 8 off 12?

ESPNcricinfo Stats Team06-Apr-2019Alzarri Joseph should probably have been an easy choice for Man of the Match after returning the best-ever match figures in the IPL, yes?Well, according to ESPNcricinfo’s , his claim to the award wasn’t so clear. Kieron Pollard’s 46 off 26 balls in a low-scoring game was valued nearly as much as Joseph’s incredible figures of 6 for 12.ESPNcricinfo LtdSmart Stats takes into account the pressure under which batsmen score their runs and their relative strike-rate compared to other batsmen. With Pollard at the crease on 8 off 11, Mumbai were 92 for 6 at the end of the 17th over. What followed was vintage Pollard: he smote 37 runs off 13 balls in the last two overs, helping Mumbai to a competitive total of 136. Pollard’s 46 were worth 68 Smart Runs.Joseph then gave Mumbai Indians the start they would have hoped for. He dismissed David Warner off his first ball and then took out an in-form Vijay Shankar. However, the rest of his six wickets came relatively cheap. The last three of them were of Rashid Khan and the tailenders and came when the match was already well within Mumbai’s grasp. Smart Stats give Alzarri’s six wickets a Smart-Wicket value of 4.9.Nevertheless, an incredible Smart Economy of 0.27 for the match meant Joseph just pipped Pollard in the race for Smart Stats’ Man-of-the-Match award. Joseph’s contribution to the match was 19.9%, marginally above Pollard’s 19.4%.Impact of Pollard’s dropped catchPollard’s innings was helped by a dropped catch, which had a great impact on Mumbai’s total and then on the result. ESPNcricinfo’s estimates the impact of the drop and how lucky it turned out to be.ESPNcricinfo LtdPollard was dropped in the 17th over when the score was 92 for 6. Mumbai were going at a run rate of 5.30. After the drop, he scored 38 off 16 and took Mumbai to a fighting total of 136. The dropped catch had an impact of 21 runs, since Mumbai had no proper batsmen left at that stage of the innings. Had the catch been taken, they would have been 92 for 7 with just Joseph, Rahul Chahar, Jason Behrendorff and Jasprit Bumrah left. Thus, the drop was a key factor for Mumbai and the game’s eventual result.

How Chennai Super Kings can change history

Historical odds are against Super Kings as they take on Mumbai for the fourth time in an IPL final, having lost two of those and all three matches this season

Deivarayan Muthu in Hyderabad11-May-2019Here we go again.Mumbai Indians v Chennai Super Kings in an IPL final.If that feels familiar, it’s because they’ve already been here three times, and long story short, the Wankhede stadium had to make room for two extra trophies.Mumbai are clearly Super Kings’ bogey team, so much that they got on the nerves of the usually uber-cool Stephen Fleming. After watching his team being rolled over for 109 last month – their lowest total at Chepauk, the head coach arrived late to the press conference and his frustrated look suggested it was because he’d been busy giving the players a dressing down during one of those rare CSK team meetings.Mumbai beat them again in the first qualifier and they had to take the Visakhapatnam detour to earn another crack at Rohit Sharma’s men.But now that they’re here, what can they do to change history?Whatever it takes…Go hard at the top or bump up DhoniSuper Kings will be enthused by fifties from Faf du Plessis and Shane Watson in the second qualifier against Delhi Capitals. But, despite that, they are still the slowest scoring team in the Powerplay in IPL 2019, going at only 6.29 runs an over in this phase while also losing the most wickets (29).ALSO READ: Big match, high stakes? Better call Faf
.Mumbai usually reserve their gun bowler Jasprit Bumrah for MS Dhoni in the end overs, considering the quick’s exceptional head-to-head record against the Super Kings captain – three wickets for 47 runs in 46 balls in the IPL.In the first qualifier at Chepauk, Super Kings dawdled to 32 for 3 in the Powerplay and banked on Dhoni to tee off in the slog, and although he launched Lasith Malinga for back-to-back sixes, Bumrah muzzled Dhoni, again, with his assortment of yorkers and slower variations.Faf du Plessis and Shane Watson gave CSK a solid start•BCCISo, perhaps, there is a case for Watson and du Plessis to ditch their go-slow at the top approach in the Powerplay. Alternatively, Dhoni could promote himself up the order and look to take down Mumbai’s other bowling options rather than being cornered by Bumrah at the death. How about some more chaos theories?An attack-first approach. Whatever it takes…Unleash spin on Rohit and de KockOf the five times Quinton de Kock and Rohit have both gone unscathed in the Powerplay in IPL 2019, Mumbai have won four times this season. When one of them falls inside the Powerplay, which has happened nine times, Mumbai have lost four matches.Both the Mumbai openers prefer pace on the ball. The Hyderabad track tends to assist the seamers, but Super Kings could go against the grain and bowl spin from both ends with the new ball. Rohit and de Kock have been dismissed by spin six times each and glaringly the South African’s strike-rate drops to 97.22 against spin as opposed to 151.9 against pace.
Rohit, meanwhile, has struck at 123.7 against spin as opposed to 132.4 against pace. Suryakumar Yadav, Mumbai’s previous match-winner, too, has had a hard time against spin, particularly legspin, having been dismissed six times while managing 130 off 102 balls against this variety. Over to you Imran Tahir (or Karn Sharma).Spin to win. Whatever it takes…Who will be Dhoni’s bike?In the first qualifier on a dry, gripping Chepauk pitch, Mumbai swapped Mitchell McClenaghan for an offspinner in Jayant Yadav, and he did his job by getting rid of the left-handed Suresh Raina.In the second qualifier against Capitals, Dhoni left out M Vijay for a sixth-bowling option in Shardul Thakur. You all know Dhoni doesn’t like to ride all his bikes at the same time. Shardul ended up bowling just one over on Friday and doesn’t offer enough batting insurance in the lower order. Could Karn Sharma be Dhoni’s bike in this IPL final, like he was last season?Dhoni picked Karn ahead of Harbhajan, despite the presence of three left-handers in Sunrisers’ top five, and the legspinner took the prized scalp of Kane Williamson while conceding 25 in this three overs.Karn Sharma bowls•BCCIKarn has a reputation of stepping up in big games. In 2017 as well, he had replaced Harbhajan in a knockout, this time for Mumbai, and put them in the final. He is also a handy lower-order batsman who strikes at nearly 125 in T20s.
Mumbai will have their match-ups ready, but Dhoni needs to find his bike and take it out for a spin. Whatever it takes…Hold on to the catchesSuper Kings will play their second knockout game in three days – not to mention the travel in between that will have taken a toll on already slow-moving legs. On the other hand, Mumbai have enjoyed a four-day break and Rohit even found time to visit the Tirupati temple.Super Kings’ slow-moving legs were in the spotlight, again, in the first qualifier when M Vijay dropped Suryakumar on 11 and Watson dropped Ishan Kishan on 2. They then put on a merry old 80-run partnership that powered Mumbai into the final.Since Dhoni prefers having du Plessis and Ravindra Jadeja in the outfield to take those pressure catches, the less athletic men often find themselves inside the 30-yard circle and history will remind them to be more vigilant.In the 2008 IPL final, Raina dropped Yusuf Pathan on 13, and the batsman proceeded to slam an unbeaten 59 to seal the title for Rajasthan Royals.Just hold on to the catches. Whatever it takes…

'Let's go one better than 2015' – Elliott

Elation and disappointment: the reactions to New Zealand’s 18-run win over India in the World Cup semi-final at Old Trafford

ESPNcricinfo staff10-Jul-2019.

It was a second straight World Cup semi-final exit for India, who had topped the league stage.

India were reduced to 24 for 4 in chase of 240, but Ravindra Jadeja and MS Dhoni put up a fight in a thrilling finish.

India's bowling brothers in arms

Deepak and Rahul Chahar, on the verge of playing together for the country, talk about coming up in the game together

Interview by Saurabh Somani02-Aug-2019They were born within three days of each other, seven years apart. They are as close to being siblings as it is possible to be without actually being brothers: their fathers are brothers; their mothers are sisters. Fast bowler Deepak Chahar and legspinner Rahul Chahar are cousins twice over, who grew up together in houses facing each other, and for whom Lokendrasingh Chahar, Deepak’s father, had the same dream: that they would play for India one day.The two have been at opposing ends of the IPL’s fiercest rivalry, Mumbai Indians v Chennai Super Kings. The 2018 tournament catapulted Deepak into the reckoning for a place in the national side, while Rahul’s steady progress through the ranks has continued apace. Cut to India’s tour of the West Indies tour in 2019, where they are part of the T20I squad, and might feature together in one (or more) of the three games. We spoke to the two during the last domestic season for a freewheeling chat.What are you memories of playing together in childhood?
Deepak: We didn’t play together much. When I started playing [with a leather ball], I was 12 years old, and he was just five. Initially my family was in Suratgarh, a town near Ganganagar [in Rajasthan]. My father was in the Air Force. We made practice wickets at home. When Papa retired, we came to Agra, and he got one turf pitch and a cement pitch made. From then I started playing more seriously, and that’s where he [Rahul] also started.We are cousins, but we are like brothers. Even the blood group in our family is the same for everyone – A positive!Back then did you ever think you would be playing together at the highest levels?
Deepak: Since the day I held a cricket ball I’ve been thinking of playing for India, and when he held the ball, that’s what he thought too – that we’re going to play together for India. These are all just steps on the way – the Ranji Trophy and other tournaments.Papa always taught us to aim big. For Rahul, Papa always tells him, “You are a bowler who can take 300-400 wickets for India.”ALSO READ: Cousins, team-mates, rivals – the Chahar v Chahar story Rahul, how did you get into cricket? Did you watch Deepak play and want to be like him?
Rahul: Well, there were nets right in front of the house, so I used to just go for timepass. But when [Dad’s older brother] saw that I had some talent with legspin, he had the same dream for me [as he had for Deepak] and my interest in cricket also grew. Plus, I wasn’t that good in studies.Deepak: That went in his favour! ()In Agra, there were some high-profile tournaments, where Ranji cricketers would also play, which had cash prizes of a lakh. I played those very late, after I had already played Under-15s. But he got to play these at nine years old. In one such match, when he was ten, our team was hit for 210 runs [in 20 overs], but he bowled four overs and took 3 for 10. He got two of the Ranji cricketers also out. I don’t remember their names, but they had played Ranji. And he got them at the age of ten!And from the time I’ve seen him, he has always performed. He has been among the highest wicket-takers at district level, at age-group levels. It hasn’t ever happened that he hasn’t been among the wickets, even at India U-19 or U-23. His graph has been very good. Deepak, was the 2018 IPL the turning point of your career?
Deepak: I had the belief always that when I get to play all 14 matches in an IPL season, I will play for the country. You can only play 14 matches if you are doing well, and if you play that many, you can show all your skills. So that was my target.Then the India call-up happened and I needed to show that I could do well there. The IPL helps a lot. Indian cricket being so much ahead of the others has a lot to do with the IPL. When I made my India debut, I had already bowled to some of those players and done well, so that was a confidence boost.”Mahi [Dhoni] is among those people who will back you fully. He won’t change his decision after just one or two matches”•BCCIWhen did you get to know you would be playing in the IPL?
Deepak: Mahi [MS Dhoni] was in Pune [Rising Pune Supergiant] for two years. He had faith in me. In the first year itself, he told me I would get to play, but unfortunately I got injured in the very first practice match. So I could play only the last two-three matches.Next year, [Steven] Smith was the captain, and his plans were different, so I played only two-three matches. But Mahi had told me he’d take me in Chennai [Super Kings] and to prepare well. So I had the belief that I will get chances. And Mahi is among those people who will back you fully. He won’t change his decision after just one or two matches. I knew that I would get at least five-six matches.And he told me later, I think before the qualifier or the final, that in their initial planning talks he had said, “This guy will play all 14 matches, so let’s talk of the others.” He had that belief in me. And if Mahendra Singh Dhoni can believe in me so much, it gave me a reason to believe in my own abilities. That is his greatness – he gives players confidence. If someone like him says, “This guy is good and he’ll do well’, the player will also feel that he belongs at that level.And how was it being picked for India?
Deepak: I thought that when I got picked for India I would yell and shout and celebrate. It happened because Jasprit Bumrah was injured. I was playing for India A that time [in England] and doing well. MSK Prasad sir told me of my selection over breakfast one morning, but also said, “Don’t tell anybody.” So my excitement stayed inside, since it wasn’t yet officially announced. But obviously I felt very happy. The first person I told was Papa.When Deepak first played for India, what was the feeling at home?
Rahul: I wasn’t at home then, I was in England. But at home, there were being beaten, everyone was dancing. Rahul, when you get selected for India, who will you tell first?
Rahul: He’s the coach, he’s the guru, so he deserves to know first.Do you ever use each other as sounding boards?
Deepak: That’s Papa’s role.Rahul: is there. If [Deepak] spots anything that I need to do, then he also calls me.Is there competition between you when you’re playing for Rajasthan? “He has taken two wickets, so I should take three?”
Rahul: No, nothing like that.Deepak: We’re happy whoever takes the wickets. Maybe if we were closer in age, there might have been a rivalry, but the age difference is too large.Rahul: always tells us that our family is half the bowling attack of the team, so together we have to take five of the ten wickets. If he takes all five, Tauji will say, “Our sons have taken five.” And he says the same if I have taken five.ALSO READ: Deepak Chahar, from CSK’s Powerplay specialist to death-overs saviourDescribe the feeling of playing for India, Deepak?
Deepak: I was achieving a dream I had had for 15 years. Actually two dreams. I had always wanted to bowl 145kph and play for India. And in that match I bowled 145kph too.When I made my Ranji Trophy debut I was very slow – around 125kph. The period in the middle when I had injuries also came about because I made a big effort to become a 140kph bowler. It is a very difficult task. Many bowlers start at 140kph and come down to 125kph.How did you do it?
Deepak: Lots of training. Changed my diet. I was vegetarian, but started eating non-veg too. Changed my lifestyle and my bowling action.You have to make a huge effort, and you have to have time. If you have those two, it’s possible to go from 125 to 140. When I decided, I was 19 years old, so I knew that I could [afford to] have a couple of bad years. But if someone who is 25 years old decides to become quicker, it might be difficult.Bhuvneshwar Kumar did it.
Deepak: Bhuvneshwar might be the only one who has done it. He’s very smart, and he increased his workload with a lot of thought. He could increase his speed without changing his action. I had to change mine, because my action wasn’t that good for bowling fast. It was good for getting swing but not for bowling quick. I changed a lot of things to ensure that I can bowl at 140kph but still get swing.Rahul, do you remember Deepak’s Ranji debut, where he took 8 for 10?

Rahul: I was at home then. We were practising and had put his phone to charge. When he went inside to check his phone, we suddenly heard him yell, “Yeahhhh.” We stopped practice and went home, and sweets were distributed to everyone. I was too young then, so I didn’t have the courage to talk to him about the achievement.What was it like to walk into the Rajasthan dressing room knowing Deepak was already there?
Rahul: It makes a difference. He has seen me since childhood, and there was someone to show me the ropes. The biggest advantage of having him around is that if there is a problem with my bowling, he’ll pick it up and tell me. Because of him, the seniors in the team already knew me, so I didn’t feel as intimidated.Deepak, how was having Rahul in the team?
Deepak: He has had a big advantage. Generally what happens in the Ranji Trophy is, there’s a lot of politics. I learned this late. We are the kind who speak our minds. I suffered a lot due to politicking after my first two years. I learned a lot there. The advantage he has is, this hasn’t happened to him. And it can’t happen too, because now I’m one of the senior players in the team, so people can’t go against him.Rahul Chahar bowls for India Under-19s in England in 2017•Sarah Ansell/Getty ImagesWhat politics?
Deepak: It happens in every team. There was a period of four years where I never got the new ball for Rajasthan. I’ve played as the fourth medium-pacer for two years. I can’t really tell you all about whatever went down, but there have been matches where the team bowled 110 overs, of which I was given just five.I’m a new-ball bowler. I’ve bowled with the new ball for India, I bowl with the new ball in the IPL – but for Rajasthan I was bowling fourth! So there is a question mark somewhere – either on the team management or whoever was taking decisions.I was also in and out of the team. Obviously your performance will suffer. You play me as a fourth bowler but expect my performance to be as it was earlier – of course it won’t happen. It can’t happen with any bowler. I would get chances on spinning tracks, and not get into the XI on green tracks. One bad performance and I would be out. When there is a sword hanging over your head, it’s difficult for a player to perform.It changed after last year because I did well in the IPL. Then everyone thought they can’t touch me.Rahul, are you normally this quiet, or is it because Deepak is here?
Rahul: It’s because my big brother’s sitting here. () Since childhood I don’t speak too much in front of elders, so…Deepak: It’s our family culture. We’ve been taught since childhood to respect elders. Not just in the family but even outside. Respect someone who’s older, no matter who they are, whether your coach, your team-mate, the guy who sweeps floors.Rahul, your domestic season has been a good one. Forty-one wickets in the Ranji Trophy, playing in a pace-dominated attack, and a successful IPL with Mumbai Indians. What went right in the Ranji Trophy this year?

Rahul: ()Deepak: I’ll tell you. He’s a wicket-taking bowler. If you give him more overs to bowl, he’ll take wickets. He’s a leggie but bowls it quick through the air. He might concede runs, but he’s going to get you wickets for sure. If he bowls 25-30 overs against any side, he can take five wickets against them.This year he got the freedom to do that. We [Rajasthan] have no spinners, so he got a long run. And in the first innings of the season, he got to bowl a lot of overs and took five wickets. And his confidence kept building.Like my debut – in my first game I got eight wickets, so my confidence was very high, and it didn’t used to matter which batsman was in front of me. Now, with experience, I do think about which batsman is there and his strengths and weaknesses. Now [Rahul] also knows that even if he has a bad day, he’s the one who’s going to get the ball when we need a spinner. He has proved himself and the team has faith in him. The fact that he’s taking that responsibility at this age is a big thing. If your team believes in you, you also believe in yourself. When did you feel proudest of Rahul?
Deepak: I’ve told him this. He bowled an over to Gautam [Gambhir] last year [in the final of the Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy of 2017-18]. The way he bowled – it was in the Powerplay and we had already been hit for some 40-50 runs. He bowled a maiden, and got him out too. He couldn’t read any of his balls, and [Gambhir] has been among the best batsmen against spinners. If you can bowl like that to such a player, it shows you belong to that level.During the Ranji Trophy quarter-final against Karnataka, Rahul dropped a catch off your bowling. You said that you yourself had never dropped a catch off him.
Deepak: I have told him, “The next time you drop one, you’re going to get whacked on the ground itself.”Rahul: I hadn’t dropped a single catch this season, and the first one I dropped was off his bowling.Deepak: And look at my record – he’s been bowling for so many years, I haven’t dropped a single catch off him. Even at slip.So is Rahul going to face any more consequences for that drop?
Rahul: He’s going to belt me!

Shami hits his stride to bust subcontinent stereotypes

Rather than bowling full and attacking the stumps, he gets batsmen bowled when they’re rooted to the crease

Karthik Krishnaswamy in Visakhapatnam06-Oct-2019Fast bowlers like conditions where they can stack their slip cordons, and Mohammed Shami is no exception, but you suspect he is at his happiest on pitches that make other fast bowlers sulk with the lack of carry. When he is asleep and dreaming about bowling, he probably dreams of galloping towards a dusty, cracked, fifth-day pitch with two short midwickets in his peripheral vision.Those fielders aren’t there for the uppish flick. If that happens, it’s a bonus. No, they are there to encourage Shami to bowl his favourite line, pitching six inches outside off stump and nipping back to hit the top of middle. Even better if the ball hits a crack or a bald patch and scoots through at shin height.On the first four days of the Visakhapatnam Test, fast bowlers from the two sides bowled a combined 105 overs and took four wickets. In 10.5 overs on the fifth day, Shami took five all by himself, four of them hitting the stumps.Shami gets a lot of batsmen bowled. Of his 158 wickets in Test cricket, 48 (30.38%) have been bowled. Of the 18 fast bowlers to have taken 100 or more Test wickets since Shami’s debut, only one has a greater percentage of bowled dismissals. If you didn’t read it here, you wouldn’t guess that that bowler is Shannon Gabriel.

Watch cricket on ESPN+

India v South Africa is available in the US on Hotstar and ESPN+. Subscribe to ESPN+ and tune in to the Tests.

It sounds counter-intuitive that Gabriel – a tall, hit-the-deck bowler who is renowned for his unpleasant bounce – gets so many batsmen bowled, but there are reasons for this. First, a massive chunk of those wickets are played-on (21 out of 41 overall, judging by wicket descriptions on ESPNcricinfo). And among the world’s top fast bowlers, he probably moves the ball the least. When he beats the inside edge, therefore, he is likelier to sneak through the gap between bat and pad than to hit the pad. Over his entire career, Gabriel has 44 bowleds (33.08%) and 16 lbws (12.03%).Shami’s bowled (30.38%) and lbw (13.92%) percentages aren’t too dissimilar to Gabriel’s. These percentages paint a different picture to the stereotype of the subcontinental fast bowler, who bowls full and attacks the stumps, gets a lot of reverse-swing, and achieves high percentages of both bowled and lbw.Shami certainly attacks the stumps, but he doesn’t usually get batsmen out by bowling full. The classic Shami dismissal isn’t the viciously dipping Waqar Younis-style yorker. Instead, he gets batsmen bowled when they are rooted to the crease, moving neither forward or back. This is perhaps why Shami doesn’t get all that many lbws.The typical length Shami hits when he gets batsmen bowled isn’t the traditional good length, which batsmen generally try and get forward to, but one that’s slightly shorter. It’s fuller than, say, Ishant Sharma’s natural length, but shorter than the length Umesh Yadav bowls when he lands his outswinger just right. It’s probably the length he grew up bowling.From that length, the ball often goes on to hit the top of off stump in Indian conditions. Couple that length with his skiddy pace, and Shami becomes an uncomfortable proposition for most batsmen to handle. When that length meets that skid and a fifth-day surface like the one in Visakhapatnam, he becomes close to unplayable.Watch his dismissal of Temba Bavuma. There is a tendency for viewers on TV, who have the luxury of watching the same ball multiple times in slow-motion, to see batsmen get defeated by low bounce and infer than they should have been on the front foot. It’s extremely difficult for batsmen to get forward to the Shami length, however, because their muscle memory won’t let them, and that muscle memory is the product of facing thousands of balls that hit the same sort of spot and don’t keep low. Their muscle memory isn’t wrong, except for the one time that it is.Even when the ball doesn’t necessarily creep through at ankle or shin height, Shami can beat batsmen with movement. He can swing the ball both ways, but whether it’s conventional or reverse, it’s seldom extravagant banana swing. More often than not, the movement is off the pitch, thanks to his gloriously upright seam position. This is harder to adjust to than swing.On this Visakhapatnam pitch, it wasn’t even necessary for Shami to present the seam so well; sometimes he just needed to hit a crack.If you freeze the replay of Faf du Plessis’ dismissal to Shami at the point where the ball hits the pitch, the length is short of the traditional good length, and the line is comfortably a full set of stumps outside off. A number of batsmen would have reacted exactly as du Plessis did, and shouldered arms. But before he knew it, his off stump had been knocked back.Mohammed Shami holds up a stump he broke•BCCIThe pitch didn’t morph into a low-bouncing jigsaw puzzle overnight; it must have had these characteristics, at least in partial measure, even on day four, but Vernon Philander and Kagiso Rabada, two of the finest fast bowlers in world cricket, couldn’t exploit them the way Shami did. The bowling styles of Philander and Rabada didn’t develop on pitches like this one. Shami’s did.”Shami, we’ve seen him in these conditions, not just today but previously as well,” Rohit Sharma said in his post-match press conference. “I still remember our debut together in Kolkata, where the pitch kind of… I wouldn’t say [it was] like this but on day four, on day five, it was slightly lower and slower, and he knows how to bowl on those pitches.”Both enjoyed stellar debuts in that game; Rohit scored a century in the first innings, and Shami picked up nine wickets in the match, six of them bowled.”He gets reverse-swing straight into play, once he knows there is some help on offer, and he uses those conditions,” Rohit said. “See, it’s not easy to bowl when you know the reverse-swing is happening; you need to pitch it in the right area, you need to make sure that the ball is just around off stump, so that it comes and hits the middle stump. Otherwise sometimes you can drag [the ball onto the pads], and while doing that you can leak a lot of runs as well.”I guess he’s mastered that pretty well by now, bowling with the old ball and trying to [get the] ball to reverse, and yes, these type of conditions are pretty ideal for him. He makes the batsman play all the balls, which is slightly tough on that kind of pitch. When you know you have to play all six balls, and the pitch at times, as we have seen, is doing something from the crack, or staying low at times as well – it keeps you in the game, for the fielders and all the other bowlers as well – and the batsman doesn’t really know what’s coming next, because he can swing it both ways.”So by now he’s mastered how to bowl with the old ball, and growing up in Calcutta where, you know, there is not much bounce – when he started playing, obviously; now it’s a different Kolkata – but when he started playing I’m sure it was similar kind of tracks he grew up on.”On Sunday, Shami was bang in the middle of his comfort zone; bowling at home, in the second innings. His home average in Tests is 23.57, and his second-innings average overall is 22.58. His second-innings average at home is a ridiculous 17.34.

When he is asleep and dreaming about bowling, he probably dreams of galloping towards a dusty, cracked, fifth-day pitch with two short midwickets in his peripheral vision.

Outside that comfort zone, he hasn’t been quite as lethal. He averages 30.39 away from home, 34.47 in the first innings overall, and an unflattering 36.19 while bowling in the first innings away from home.On surfaces with more bounce than the typical Indian pitch, the ball is less likely to go on and hit the stumps from Shami’s natural length. Batsmen, therefore, can play back to him with a greater degree of certainty. The fields Shami bowls to in overseas conditions, usually, are set for the outside edge, with more catchers behind the wicket. They don’t offer him the same amount of leg-side protection when he strays in line.Shami gets more seam movement away from home, and a lot more bounce, and when he combines those two in the fourth-stump channel he can look menacing, but there are days, such as during the Oval Test last year, when he beats the bat so often without finding the edge that you wonder if he could pitch it a few inches closer to the batsman.These fine margins were probably why Shami averaged 26.01 in largely seam-friendly conditions during India’s recent run of away tours, while Jasprit Bumrah averaged 19.24 and a new-and-improved Ishant Sharma 20.50. Shami did a fine job overall, and ran through sides on a couple of occasions, but there were times when his rhythm appeared off and his wicket threat subdued.Opportunities to improve that away record will arrive soon enough, when India tour New Zealand and Australia next year. Until then, in their next four Tests against South Africa and Bangladesh, all at home, India will be delighted if he can keep hitting that Shami length and keep producing that Shami skid.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus