Pujara, Kohli swap roles to dominate England

In a commanding stand of 226 runs, Virat Kohli appeared careful and solid like Cheteshwar Pujara, who was free-flowing and entertaining like Kohli

Alagappan Muthu in Visakhapatnam17-Nov-20162:09

Ganguly: Pujara and Kohli, the perfect No.3 and 4

Virat Kohli cased the joint. The security was tight. Two slips, a short point, a short cover and a third man and sweeper on the boundary. Visakhapatnam was housing precious cargo. First-innings runs. The India captain was on a mission to steal them.He had to be mindful of a few traps though. England’s seamers were the first to highlight the weakness he has outside the off stump. While the pitch offered no sideways movement, which was often Kohli’s undoing in 2014, since when is the tendency to drive away from the body predicated on the conditions?In the morning, Stuart Broad filled an over with good-length balls on sixth or seventh stump. Kohli simply let them go. He was new to the crease. He could not afford to play those audacious shots through the covers. India were two down in the first half hour and there were men waiting for edges, both outside and leading. Once, when his patience flickered, he was beaten by a legcutter that bounced a lot more than it should have. England were setting up trip wires to catch a careless thief.Kohli had to be cautious. To do what he loves – dominate – in a Test match, he had put in the work. Spend time in the middle. Get used to the pitch, get used to the bowling. Thereafter, he is a good enough player to come up with a counter. By shuffling across the off stump, he was able to reach for those full and wide deliveries without having to stretch out. This method works well provided there is no swing or seam. By the end of the day the cover drive was his most profitable shot.Smuggling a total of 317 out is not a one-man job, though. Cheteshwar Pujara is not normally one to break the rules. Maybe that’s why he looked like he was having so much fun. On 99, after rocking back to hit an Adil Rashid long hop high over midwicket, he admired the ball disappear into the crowd. And when it did, he turned around to the dressing room with the smile of a man who was starting to love his walk on the wild side. “Completing a hundred with a six was special.”Not to mention rare. Before this match, in 6134 balls faced, Pujara had sent only five over the fence. Why should he bother when he has such quick feet that he can turn decently-flighted deliveries from nervous spinners into full tosses and crunch them for four or slide back so deep in his crease that even a good length-ball is treated with almost the same merit as a long hop. He made 75 of his 119 runs at a strike-rate of almost 70 against the slow bowlers.The last time India’s Nos. 3 and 4 both scored centuries in the first innings of a Test was in 2007•Associated PressAnd so a trend became apparent. For much of their 226-run partnership, Pujara was free-flowing and entertaining like Kohli. And Kohli was careful and solid like Pujara.Pujara took on an 8-1 off-side field with a cut shot that was placed outstandingly well. It split point and cover and was too fine for the sweeper. Shots like that are his captain’s trademarks. Having been asked to show more intent, Pujara showed plenty right in front of the man who had wanted him to do so.Kohli, in turn, emulated his partner’s prudence. He has an instinctive pull shot and it got him into trouble a couple of times – a top-edge off James Anderson flew a lot finer than intended and another off Ben Stokes could have ended his innings on 56, had the catch been taken, in the 43rd over. Recognising that he was not timing that shot as well as he normally does – like on a fast pitch where he might have the ball coming onto his bat – he stowed the shot away. Even his calm march through the nineties had shades of Pujara in it. Right down to a simple raise of the bat after he brought up his hundred.But then, it came down in a twirl. In his 50th Test, as India’s captain, Kohli knew his 151 not out had put his team on the path to a possible victory. Pujara’s contribution – and evolution – cannot be underestimated either. With his 119, he now averages 66 in the first innings of Tests. No Indian – with a minimum cut-off of 20 innings – has done better.

Dismissing Tendulkar, and an U-19 triple

Also, what’s the record for most matches without scoring a run?

Steven Lynch18-Apr-2017What is the earliest Test match in which a cricketer who is still alive played? asked Allan Alexander from the United States

The answer to this interesting question was a remarkably close-run thing. The oldest Test match in which a player still alive at the time of writing took part started on January 21, 1948 in Bridgetown: local boy Everton Weekes made his debut for West Indies, against England. Two days later, on the other side of the world, Australia gave a first cap to the 19-year-old Neil Harvey, in the fourth Test against India in Adelaide. Three other men who played Test cricket in the 1940s are still alive: the New Zealander John Reid, who made his debut in England in July 1949, and the South African pair of Jack Nel and John Watkins, who both played in the first Test against Australia in Johannesburg on Christmas Eve, 1949. Their team-mate Ronald Draper won his first cap in the fourth Test of that series, at the Wanderers in February 1950. Watkins, who’s now 94, is the oldest living Test player at the moment.Who bowled one ball to Sachin Tendulkar in international cricket, and got him out with it? asked Frank Simpson from Australia

The owner of the 100% record against Test cricket’s top run-scorer is none other than the current Australian captain, Steven Smith, who started his international career as a legspinning allrounder, although he doesn’t bowl much anymore. The first ball he sent down to Sachin Tendulkar, in the third Test in Mohali in 2012-13, had him caught at short leg by Ed Cowan for 37 – and Smith never bowled to Tendulkar again. Greg Matthews, another Australian spinner, had an even better record against the Sri Lankan batsman Marvan Atapattu: he bowled two balls to him (both in Colombo in August 1992), and got him out twice.Jasprit Bumrah of India has played 35 white-ball matches now for India and still hasn’t scored a run. Is this a record? asked Piyush Patel from India

Jasprit Bumrah’s remarkable international career now extends to 11 one-day internationals and 24 T20 games – and he still hasn’t scored a run. One reason for that is that he’s only batted six times, facing just three balls in total so far. Although there’s still time for Bumrah to edge a four and ruin everything, it’s easily a record for a complete career: next comes the Jamaican Krishmar Santokie, who never scored a run in 12 appearances for West Indies. But one of Bumrah’s team-mates is giving him a run for his money: legspinner Yuzvendra Chahal has played nine internationals now, and hasn’t batted at all!Chris Gayle still holds the record for the fastest T20 hundred – scored off 30 balls, in an IPL match in 2013•BCCIWho’s the only person to score a triple-century in an Under-19 Test match? asked Stuart Peake from Australia

Given your surname, I have a sneaking suspicion you might know the answer to this – because the gentleman concerned is Clinton Peake, from Victoria, who racked up 304 not out for Australia Under-19 against India Under-19 at the MCG in 1994-95. Sadly, this didn’t translate to a stellar first-class career: Peake, a diminutive left-hander, played only nine matches, with a top score of 46. One of his team-mates from this match didn’t have a bad international career, though, despite taking 0 for 99 in the first innings: Brett Lee went on to take 310 wickets in Tests and 380 in one-day internationals.Who has scored the fastest hundred in a T20 match? asked Clive McDonald from England

It’s not a great surprise to learn that the fastest hundred in T20 cricket was scored by Chris Gayle, who’s about to become the first to complete 10,000 runs in the format (he has 9997 as I write). Gayle reached three figures in just 30 balls for the Royal Challengers in an IPL match against Pune Warriors in Bengaluru in 2013; the hundred included 11 sixes and eight fours. He finished with 175 not out and 17 sixes, both still records for a T20 innings. Before Gayle’s onslaught, the record was held by the Australian Andrew Symonds, who blitzed a century from 34 balls for Kent against Middlesex in Maidstone in 2004.Who called his life story Under the Southern Cross? asked Keerthi Nagarajah from India

My first thought was that this was the recent (2013) retirement volume from Michael Hussey, but on closer inspection that turned out to be called Underneath the Southern Cross. The one you’re after came from an Australian batsman of an earlier generation: David Boon’s 1996 autobiography was called Under the Southern Cross, with no “neath” to be seen. Just in case anyone doesn’t know, the Southern Cross is the constellation of stars that appears on the Australian flag, and it’s mentioned in the team song the Aussies like to sing after each Test victory*: “Under the Southern Cross I stand/ A sprig of wattle in my hand/ A native of my native land/ Australia you little beauty!” The tradition is said to have started with Rod Marsh. Both Boon and Hussey were charged with leading the team singalong in the dressing room, a duty now performed by Nathan Lyon.Post your questions in the comments below*April 18, 11.55GMT: The answer was amended to include the fact that Australia’s team song is sung after each victory and not each Test

Corey Anderson's struggle

The New Zealand allrounder has had to fight expectations and wrestle with injury. Most of all, he has had to strive to outdo his potential

Jarrod Kimber08-Jun-2017One man obscures the breakfast buffet; there is no way to see the scrambled eggs or . This is a man worth millions, who broke a world record and has been playing cricket at the top level for a while now, but it’s in his obscuring the buffet that you suddenly realise Corey Anderson isn’t like other cricketers.There is that now infamous picture of Barry Richards holding an old bat next to a new bat, and making a funny face about the size discrepancy. Well, if you took Corey Anderson’s arm and compared to it Don Bradman’s entire body, you could probably make the same kind of photo. When Anderson retires, he can stay in cricket as a sightscreen by just wearing a black T-shirt over his massive shoulders.Even if you had never seen him play before, hadn’t heard any whispers about him, as he walked out to the wicket, you would be expecting carnage. The potential for damage from a man this size is as big as his shoulders.

****

Anderson’s father was a runner – 100 and 200m sprints and 4x100m relay at the 1974 Commonwealth Games. His mother was a netballer, a shooter, despite her small stature, meaning Anderson was born into a sporting family within a sporting nation.Anderson was first noticed at primary school. It was the semi-final of the school competition, and Kane Williamson had just scored a hundred for his side. Williamson’s team would lose when Anderson scored a hundred, with eight sixes. At one stage Anderson’s mother had to give the school a whole box of balls because he’d he lost so many with his sixes.A few years later a 16-year-old Anderson was promoted beyond Under-17s to the Under-19s for Canterbury. “I ended up facing Tim Southee and Trent Boult, who were bowling for Northern Districts – the first day of the under-19 competition and I scored a hundred against them.” Shortly after, he got another call-up, “I got picked to play for New Zealand Under-19s against India, Kohli, Rahane, Chawla, Jadeja and Ishant Sharma.”

“I saw Chris Harris, Peter Fulton, Michael Papps, and I was just this kid not knowing what the hell I was doing, but part of their team. It felt like I’d won a competition or something”

Kohli said of Anderson: “When we came to New Zealand with the Under-19s, in Dunedin he scored a hundred on a drop-in wicket which was very difficult, and he hit some massive sixes there as well.” It wasn’t a hundred (Kohli might have conflated the Dunedin innings with the one where Anderson struck six fours and four sixes, in Kuala Lumpur against India U-19s); but it was 88 at better than a run a ball, with ten fours and four sixes. “He had a lot of power.”After all that excitement, Anderson had to go back to his normal life and do things as mundane as competing in his school’s athletics day. A bit bored by not facing Trent Boult and Ishant Sharma, he couldn’t be bothered. “If you don’t do anything, you get in trouble for not doing anything, so when I heard my name coming out from an announcement at the stadium, I went, ‘Oh no, I’m in trouble.’ I had to see the headmaster down in the main office. But he told me I’d be playing for Canterbury. I thought he just meant an underage team, but he said, ‘You’re playing for the Canterbury Wizards, in first-class cricket’, and he said that I had to go play an away game.”Anderson was the youngest to play first-class cricket in New Zealand for 58 summers, and his second game of first-class cricket was the State Championship final, the pinnacle of first-class cricket in New Zealand.”I hadn’t trained with them, I hadn’t even met them, all I’d done is just watched them on TV. Turned up at the airport and I saw Chris Harris, Peter Fulton, Michael Papps, all these guys who had played international cricket, and I was just this kid not knowing what the hell I was doing, but part of their team. It felt like I’d won a competition or something. It was strange.”In November of 2006 Anderson was a schoolboy and under-17 cricketer. In December he was a 16-year-old Canterbury under-19 cricketer; in January 2007 a New Zealand under-19 cricketer. And in March 2007 he was a first-class cricketer with Canterbury. In five months, while turning 16, he went from a schoolboy cricketer to a first-class cricketer without ever playing club cricket.

****

“I don’t think you even know what ready is, so going from school cricket to first-class cricket was just a big blur.”Anderson has increasingly come to be realistic about the fact that his bowling will be a second string to his bow•Associated PressAnderson was a big-hitting allrounder; he knew that he had a chance of higher honours. Tim Southee had already made the national side. “It also became a bit of a burden because everything happened so fast, you start thinking, ‘What’s the next level I can go to – it’s international cricket.’ You don’t end up learning anything about your game, you don’t know what kind of player you are, you haven’t even grown up to be the person you want to be. All of a sudden you’re thinking you’re ready to play international cricket as more of default rather than working to get there.”There were good moments in the first three years. He smashed the top score in a List A match by a No. 8. Before him in the order were Rob Nicol, Peter Fulton, Craig McMillan and Kruger van Wyk. The bowlers he was facing included Iain O’Brien and Jeetan Patel. Chris Harris and Anderson put on 60 in five overs: Harris made 18 not out, Anderson 52 not out off 29. The problem was the following year, when he only managed four T20s and no other cricket through the entire summer.The easy thing to do was stay in Canterbury, the district that his father represented at rugby and his mother played netball for. He decided to travel to Northern Districts. Without a contract.Modern sportsmen don’t give up their contracts, their livelihood, without something solid to go to. Anderson went to Northern Districts with a groin injury and no deal. “The monetary value of the contract never really came into play. I wanted to go somewhere where I would enjoy my cricket and get better at my cricket.” He left Canterbury because he was a young man who believed he was getting stale, and because he believed in himself so much he didn’t need a contract at Northern Districts, he’d earn one when he was there.When he went to Northern Districts, he lost 15-20kg (“It grows by a kg every year”). With the backing of the coach, Grant Bradburn, who had tried to get him to make the move a year earlier, he was fitter, and he “felt at home straight away”.The first year he still only managed four first-class games but won a contract. At the start of the next season he made 167 (28 fours) against Otago. After years of being in the system, this was the moment everyone had wanted from him.

When the bowler is at the top of his mark, he thinks that there are no grounds big enough to hold Anderson. When Anderson faces up, he thinks that he needs to live up to what he could be

By the end of that summer he was playing for a New Zealand XI against England, and making a better-than-a-run-a-ball 67 against Stuart Broad, Graeme Swann, Chris Woakes and Graham Onions. And in the winter he made a tour to India with New Zealand A. He made a hundred there too.Anderson made a hundred in primary school cricket that elevated him to age group cricket. He made a hundred in under-19 cricket that made him a first-class player. He made a hundred in first-class cricket that made him an A player. And he made an A hundred that made him a Test player. When Anderson made a hundred in Bangladesh in his second Test, it was only his third first-class hundred. But almost every time he makes a hundred, his life changes.

****

New Zealand cricket has certain archetypes – allrounders who bowl seam, players who are more feted overseas, players who are born into sporting dynasties, child prodigies, and those who are picked on potential rather than results. Anderson is all of these things. And while they are the well-known archetypes, the most consistent one is that of the ignored New Zealand player.There are whole villages in New Zealand where former limited-overs players live in silence, only knowingly nodding to each other as they pass in the street. Warren Lees, Bruce Blair, Mark Priest, Blair Hartland, Iain Butler and Michael Mason, just names on a scorecard, maybe you saw them in the boring middle overs once, or read a headline that had their name in it, but they come in, play some games and fade away.Anderson could have been that kind of player. His body doesn’t let him bowl as fast as he can, meaning he’s a middle-overs trundler rather than front-line. His batting potential would have kept getting him back in the team, but without a huge amount of runs behind him, and being the attacking player he was, he might never have got much of a run in international cricket. Instead, he’d be a frequent squad member and occasional player throughout his career.Weather and a small ground at Queenstown changed that. The rain reduced the game so much that instead of an ODI it was a 21-overs-a-side match, a T20 with a bonus slogging over.When Anderson was fast-tracked into the Under-19s at 16 years of age, he made a century against Tim Southee and Trent Boult in his first game•BCCIIt starts with the ball landing among the spectators, them trying to catch, or duck, with many opportunities for both. Then you see the spectators all turning to look at them – so much of the footage is of fans facing away from the ground, trying to see if Anderson has smashed one into a nearby mountain. At one stage Ravi Rampaul is smiling on his way back to his mark, because if you don’t smile, you cry, and if you cry, Anderson will hit your tears for six as well. When Nikita Miller sees Anderson backing away, he tries to bowl a quick one that ends up getting stuck in his hand, and ends up as a wide long hop. Anderson is falling away, and then suddenly launches himself at the ball like a kid in a tennis-ball game and hits it over cover for six.When you watch the innings it’s as if the ghosts of cricket’s big-hitting past turn up to watch. Trumper, Bonnor, Sinclair, Trott, Jessop, Sobers, Cairns, Klusener, Jayasuriya, Dev, Richards, Afridi and Jayasuriya, all just sitting on the grass banks, smiling and laughing at the carnage.The hundred comes up off 36 balls, a ball quicker than Shahid Afridi, and the world record is broken, but Anderson ends on 131 off his 47. What made it all the more surprising was that it was his first-ever one-day hundred in professional cricket. After seven years of potential, he had one limited-overs hundred and one world record.For all the good it brought, not least the financial security of a few big overseas contracts, it was also a burden, “The world record came too early. It changed my life, for the good. But at the same, time having something like that every time you go out to bat, the crowd starts thinking you are going to hit sixes all the time. Even teams start to think, if he can do that, why isn’t he doing it?”

****

As a teenager and into his early 20s, Anderson was missing a lot of the season through groin and shoulder injuries. When he finally made the international team, he lost his spot when he was struck on the hand in the nets. In Sri Lanka he had a rib injury. There was a finger injury that almost stopped him from making his first IPL. A groin injury against Sri Lanka at home. He was withdrawn from the CPL by NZC. Broken finger at the 2015 IPL. A back problem that stopped him from going to Australia, and then another back injury to follow that.A few times recently for New Zealand, and also in different domestic competitions, Anderson has played as a batsman. “I’m thankful that I can bat well enough to be still picked as a batter, but I feel like I’m half the player when I’m not bowling.” And the truth is that one day Anderson might have to accept that he can only be a batsman, “I’d be lying if I said it hasn’t played on my mind. I think looking at what I want to do as a player, and what New Zealand cricket needs as a team, the best thing for me to do is play as an allrounder.”

When he grew up, he wanted to be Chris Cairns. Nothing much has changed. “I wanna be an allrounder and I feel like I gotta be an allrounder”

The main problem for Anderson is that he’s two athletes, a baseball slugger and a seam bowler. The power he needs for one comes partly from the weight that makes the other so hard. “Being big, it helps with my power game when I bat, but it may not help with my bowling. But I know other guys like Adam Milne, who is one of the strongest and fittest guys in our side, and he still gets injuries. It’s part of bowling; everyone gets injured. If you could try and drop more weight to be lighter at the crease when you’re bowling, you’ve lost your power when you’re batting”.When he grew up, he wanted to be Chris Cairns. Nothing much has changed. “I wanna be an allrounder and I feel like I gotta be an allrounder.”

****

Anderson is still learning who he is as a player: the constant injuries, the stop-starts, and the feeling that he has that he’s still getting picked on what he might be able to do, instead of what he does. But there have been some very batsman-like innings from him as well. His half-century in the World Cup semi-final was one, a 34 off 42 balls in the first game of the World T20 on a tricky Nagpur pitch another, and there was also a quality 81 against Sri Lanka in a tough, low chase where he shepherded the bottom order home.These are not the innings that Anderson gets worship for, but all of these innings led to wins.It was a conversation with Brendon McCullum that led to Anderson trying not to replicate his world-record knock every time he went out to bat. McCullum had felt the same pressure after opening the IPL with a century, but over time learned that you can’t bat like that every time.In his IPL career, Anderson is striking at a very low 113 throughout the middle stages of the innings, “There are times I’ve tried to strike at 300 from the start of my innings and get out. So I think that there are many times I need to knock the ball around and earn the time to hit out, so I need to do more of that.” At the death in the IPL, he strikes at 230.Talking to Brendon McCullum helped Anderson come to terms with the fact that he couldn’t attempt to replicate his ODI record hundred every time he went out to bat•Getty Images”The way I play is tough to replicate every day, but I’d love to replicate it more often than I do.”

****

“The ‘potential’ tag is, I guess, it’s always there, it’s still always there. Yeah, the ‘potential’ tag is always there.”The word “potential” was used by Anderson more than ten times when we spoke, almost always brought up by him. He had to fight against the child-prodigy tag, he had to play against the expectations of a world record, and he had to fight his own body every step of the way. But his real battle hasn’t been against these things, or opponents analysing his game as he becomes more well known, or international bowlers; it’s the fight he has to outdo the potential he has.”New Zealand being a small country, our playing pool isn’t as big, so once you get touted, they go after them. If you look at what we’ve had in the past, we have a lot of X-factor match-winning players, so I suppose from a young age I was in that bracket. So as soon as you do something, you’re right to go.”The biggest thing for me was that I thought I wouldn’t play for New Zealand until I’d done all this hard work.” Anderson is only 26 but has ten years of professional cricket behind him. His talent, his power, jumped the queue. And that still plays on his mind. When the bowler is at the top of his mark, he thinks that there are no grounds big enough to hold Anderson. When Anderson faces up, he thinks that he needs to live up to what he could be. “That ‘potential’ tag still lies within me.”If Anderson ever conquers his potential, the only thing bigger than his shoulders will be the impact he has on world cricket.

Wright flicks Derbyshire's T20 switch

From being one of the worst T20 sides in the country to quarter-finalists, Derbyshire have reaped the benefit of their ground-breaking move to appoint a specialist coach

Jarrod Kimber01-Sep-2017Wayne Madsen is warming up to bowl the first over. Last season he bowled eight overs; this year he has bowled that many just in the first over of the innings. He has become a specialist first-over T20 spinner, which is very much on trend right now. The fact that Derbyshire, without doubt the worst team in the history of T20 domestic cricket in England, have managed to get to the quarter-finals, using data, research and a former IPL coach, says much for how English cricket has changed.Once a backwards cricket nation when it came to white-ball cricket tactics and growth, England is now one of the most aggressive and experimental. West Indies was the best team at the 2016 World T20 in India, but England was the most aggressive. Their run rates in ODI cricket over the last couple of years are the best cricket has ever produced. Their players are now encouraged to miss IPL seasons. They came into an ICC tournament as legitimate favourites. And they are even ripping up their precious county system to look into one of these new-fangled leagues all the kids are talking about.Things have changed. A team like Northants, which is barely thought of at all, is a powerhouse of T20 cricket and that is largely down to them focusing on T20 cricket and their Moneyball-style approach. It’s not just them either, the Blast run rate this year during the group stage was the highest on record for any T20 league ever; it dipped slightly during the knockout games but is still 8.45 an over, which is huge.This all leads us back to Derbyshire, who are terrible at T20 cricket. Twice in 14-game seasons they have won only a single match. In the 14 seasons of English domestic T20 before this year, Derbyshire made the quarter-finals once. In the last decade they have a 25% win record in their completed games. They haven’t had a positive win-loss record in a single one of those seasons. The time they reached the last eight was in 2005, when some counties weren’t aware of T20’s existence. They are, without doubt, without exaggeration, and completely objectively, the single worst T20 side in county cricket history.So last year, Kim Barnett was brought in to fix the club (the first-class team didn’t win a single game either). “We’d done a top to bottom investigation into our cricket last year,” he says. “Our record in T20 is abysmal; we’ve never been to Finals Day. And I had the authority to redefine everything, so having a T20 coach was my first bit.”

“When I looked at the stats of previous T20 performances, we were ranked 17th [out of 18] in both batting and bowling”Derbyshire T20 coach John Wright

The good news was that Barnett had someone in mind who was a former Derbyshire legend but, more importantly, knew a bit about T20. “John Wright was connected to the Mumbai Indians, and also we know him personally, after ten years at the club playing. A good guy to have in the club, and he’s a good coach, coaching the Indian team as well.”But here’s the kicker, Wright was brought in only as a T20 coach. He wouldn’t be coaching the first-class or one-day teams, just the T20 team. Barnett created the first ever T20 specialist coach in county cricket. “They had given me authority as we had been bottom of the County Championship and we’d never been to Finals Day, so I had authority to do it how I thought best.”Barnett also hired Imran Tahir, one of the world’s most effective T20 bowlers. “I sort of thought, if I get Imran here and John, it’ll be a good start and people might think things are happening at the club. So when we went to sign other people, it might just persuade them we are moving in the upwards direction.”Wright is no ordinary coach; he’s sort of the coach’s coach. One of those talented-but-battling Test players of the 1980s who got the absolute most out of himself, and was articulate enough to write entertaining books about it and explain to others the best way to improve themselves. As an outsider from New Zealand, he coached India and somehow seemed to come out of it with a more positive reputation than when he started. And if you read his early book, you also realise how he was ahead of the curve when it came to thinking about the game.Before the 2003 World Cup, he was talking about getting the most from India’s star batsmen after looking at the stats. He talks about how when they hit a boundary, the pressure never went off them. What got the pressure off them was scoring consistently, not three dots and a four. He doesn’t give that theory a name in his book, but over the last few years cricket data analysts have called it “activity rate”. This is not just an affable Kiwi with a solid cricket background; this is a first-rate cricket mind that was ahead of the curve.Luis Reece was one of the stars of Derbyshire’s Blast campaign•Getty ImagesIf Wright is no longer on the cutting edge of the T20 revolution (he laughed when asked if he was a T20 pioneer), he’s certainly not far from it. After being the coach of Mumbai Indians – currently one of cricket’s most data-dependent sides – he has stayed on as their scout and advisor. Derbyshire managed to get a man with decades of cricket knowledge, a profound personal connection to their club, one of the world’s most respected coaches, who also works within one of cricket’s most evolved T20 teams.But the IPL and Blast are completely different beasts. There are the financial pressures of a small-town team like Derbyshire. And then there is the fact this isn’t just a team of T20 guns; you have to build your team around whoever is already in the larger squad. Wright wasn’t happy when he looked at the numbers last year. “When I looked at the stats of previous T20 performances, we were ranked 17th in both batting and bowling – in conceding runs per over and in runs scored.”He looked to strengthen the bowling side. “Bowling is important, as is fielding, as they are your defensive side,” he says. So Wright brought in fellow New Zealander Matt Henry for the bowling. With him, Hardus Viljoen, Henry and Tahir, Derbyshire had a pretty decent bowling attack.That sorted, Barnett still had some issues. “We were probably concerned about the batting. Because we didn’t have anybody who had a great name from the domestic side.” Wright found a way to make the batting better, according to Barnett: “Madsen hadn’t been used in T20 particularly well before. Luis Reece was new at the club. Those two made nearly a thousand runs between them.” Madsen and Reece combined for 959 runs, to be exact, and scored at a decent strike rate.With their bowling good and their batting ignited, Derbyshire had the third best net run rate in the group stage and won eight games (equal most). In the last four seasons combined, they had only won 11 games.

“Looking back now, would I have bowled a seamer in the first over? Yeah, because he might not have gone for that many and Afridi might not have got a hundred”Derbyshire T20 captain Gary Wilson about the quarter-final against Hampshire

They weren’t even the only side to try the specialist T20 coach – Middlesex did a similar thing with Daniel Vettori after Derbyshire went for Wright. But Vettori wasn’t as successful. Vettori is the sort of coach you would expect to be the first T20 specialist. That is essentially his role; he basically came straight off the field into coaching; he’s played T20 cricket, he could probably still get a few overs through if needed. Wright can’t even give throwdowns anymore.Wright never played T20. He retired ten years before it existed. Gary Wilson, Derbyshire’s T20 captain, says: “He’s probably one of the older coaches I’ve worked with, but that hasn’t curbed his enthusiasm. He doesn’t feel old-fashioned, he scouts for Mumbai in the IPL, so he’s very up to date.”Because of his passion for cricket, and his intellectual interest in T20, Wright is still successful at it. “You try to do research,” he says. “A bit of everything, really. You look to the way players play, how to get them out, if you can’t get them out, where do you restrict them, where do you not put the ball.”Wilson has been impressed by this side of Wright: “He’s very thorough in his preparation, in scouting the opposition players and stuff, quite big on his data and scoring areas. He watches a lot of video.”So going into the quarter-final, against Hampshire, Wright had passed on all he had seen to Wilson and his team. And then Shahid Afridi surprisingly walked out to open the batting.Afridi had been poor with the bat in this season’s Blast, making 50 runs off 52 balls. He had been dropped, and also overlooked at critical moments, when his hitting could have won games. And now he was opening the batting. Wright first started coaching against Afridi almost 20 years ago; his research on him was deep. “I always leave it up to the captain – you can’t lead teams from the sideline,” he says. “You trust them to make the right decision. There was the argument, if Afridi came out, you know – maybe try seam.”Wayne Madsen was a revelation for Derbyshire•Getty ImagesMadsen was warming up, Afridi was walking out, and Wilson did consider it. “Yeah we could have gone to seamers,” he says now. Instead he stuck with Madsen’s handy offspin. And that wasn’t the only decision Wilson made. “I took two steps back at midwicket, because it was Afridi.”First ball, Afridi mishit a shot towards midwicket that landed, more or less, two paces in front of Wilson. The next five balls of the over contained four boundaries. Later Madsen had a chance to catch Afridi; he didn’t take it. So their star of the season was smashed out of the attack first over, before dropping a simple catch. The rest of the bowlers were hit too, and their captain backed what they had done all year. Afridi made 101 off 43 balls.”He got a hundred in a 50-over game when I was coaching India and Bob Woolmer was coaching Pakistan,” Wright recalls, before considering Derbyshire’s defeat. “It wasn’t our night. Afridi took it away, past us, really. We were hurt today. I mean 200, you hope, but 250, well… we were hammered.”Derbyshire took T20 seriously, came up with intelligent batting and bowling plans, had their greatest ever season, brought in county cricket’s first ever T20 specialist coach, got a home quarter-final, and then Afridi came out to open for the first time that year. “Looking back now, would I have bowled a seamer in the first over? Yeah, because he might not have gone for that many and Afridi might not have got a hundred,” Wilson says. T20 is 240 moments; Wilson and Derbyshire made a mistake on the first one, and never got back in the game.Had Derbyshire not appointed Wright and taken their T20 so seriously, they wouldn’t have even had the chance have their hearts broken by Afridi in their second ever quarter-final. This is just a lesson for next year. As the 63-year-old Wright says of himself, and really everyone else in cricket: “I’m still learning T20.”

A tale of two Saads, and a two-day game

All the thrills and spills from the fifth round of the Quaid-e-Azam Trophy

ESPNcricinfo staff24-Oct-2017Two Saads making wavesMohammad Saad, the 27-year old middle-order batsman from WAPDA, scored his third hundred of the season, a combative unbeaten 134 that rescued his side from a crisis. Replying to National Bank Limited’s 314, WAPDA were reeling at 181 for 9 when Mohammad Asif joined him. The two added an astonishing 140 for the last wicket, enabling WAPDA to take an improbable seven-run lead. Eventually, the partnership would prove instrumental in helping the defending champions win by six wickets.In the previous round, the Gujranwala-born Saad had made another exceptional hundred under pressure. Then, WAPDA were eight down, chasing 246, but he stood firm, steering his side towards their target, only for Taj Wali to mankad No. 11 Mohammad Irfan with WAPDA just four runs from their target. In any case, innings like these have moved Saad into the top three run-scorers in the QeA Trophy this season.Then there is Saad Ali, who plays for United Bank Limited. He is the leading run-getter so far, with 636 runs at 127.20. The 24-year old left-hander was born in Karachi and made his debut in domestic cricket in 2012. He scored his first double-hundred in the most recent round of fixtures, against Pakistan TV, leading his side to an emphatic victory in Sialkot to maintain his side’s grip on top spot in Pool B.A one-and-a-half day matchMisbah-ul-Haq led Sui Northern Gas Pipelines Limited to a crushing defeat of Sui Southern Gas Corporation in just one-and-a-half days of play in Faisalabad. A venue that has been traditionally known for batting turned into a batsman’s graveyard, 32 wickets falling in five sessions, 17 on the opening day alone. SSGC, after being asked to bat first, were dismissed for 129 in 41.3 overs. Thereafter, demolition-man Ahmed Jamal single-handedly ripped through SNGPL to bowl them out for 144. SSGC could only set a target of 60, which was chased down in 27.1 overs, SNGPL cruising home by eight wickets.Sensational Jamal rises to the occasionThe 6’4″ Jamal was once named the ‘King of Speed’ after winning a 2013 talent-hunt programme run by the PCB. At the age of 24, he clocked 143kph to win Rs. 1 million and the opportunity to work with Wasim Akram in Karachi. He has been on the circuit since 2009, but has never been a national prospect. But he’s done his chances no harm with his performance in Faisalabad, achieving career-best figures of 9 for 50 against SNGPL.Amad Butt pushes his case againHere we go again, talking about a Pakistani fast bowler. The 22-year old right-arm quick earned a T20 call-up in England last year, but wasn’t given a chance to make his debut in what was Sarfraz Ahmed’s first T20I as captain. But after a somewhat indifferent start to the QeA this year, he roared back to form with match figures of 10 for 49, picking up five wickets in each innings. It helped Habib Bank beat Khan Research Laboratories by 93 runs, and maintained the heat on Pool B leaders UBL. His teammate Imran Farhat, the former Pakistan batsman, didn’t enjoy quite such a good game, bagging a pair at No. 4.Fawad watchIt would be a shame to jinx it, but since his century in Round 3, Fawad Alam has failed to maintain the form he needs to continue applying pressure on the national selectors. That was the case again in the two-day game between SSGC and SNGPL, with Fawad only able to notch up 10 and 5 as his side slumped to an eight-wicket defeat. His side are still at the top of Pool A, however, but now only one point separates them and SNGPL.

The Achilles heel of England's World Cup hopes

The T20 series offered England hope they can work out Kuldeep Yadav but the effectiveness of wristspin counters their preferred route of flat one-day pitches

George Dobell at Trent Bridge12-Jul-20182:00

Harmison: Kohli’s captaincy sustained pressure for Kuldeep

“And we’ll go on getting bad results…”Jimmy Hill wasn’t talking about England’s cricket team when he made that now famous remark – it is sampled in the song for those who have been living on the moon in recent days – but it fits pretty well anyway.England have a long-standing and serious issue when confronted by quality spin bowling. It has, in recent times, cost them dearly in the Caribbean, Bangladesh, India, Sri Lanka and the UAE. And now there seems to be every chance it could derail their World Cup hopes.Even here at Trent Bridge, on what might be considered the spiritual home of England’s ODI resurgence – it has been here that they have twice set world record ODI totals – they were exposed by that weakness once more.To be fair, Kuldeep Yadav’s skill is rare and precious. There are few, if any, left-arm wristspinners on the county circuit (Akhil Patel, the brother of Samit, played 2nd XI cricket for Derbyshire as recently as last year but hasn’t played a first-class game since 2011, while Jake Lintott played one T20 match for Hampshire last year) so the challenge offered by Kuldeep is unusual. The angles, the drift, the turn – all will require adjustment time and experience. And that is even before we acknowledge that he has excellent control and found, at times, sharp turn on a perfectly good surface on which other spinners found little assistance. He looks a fine bowler.He is also a bowler who threatens to undermine England’s whole ODI method. For such bowlers can unlock even the best batting tracks – the very quickest fast bowlers might be able to do the same thing – which means there is an Achilles heel in England’s approach. No longer can they simply prepare excellent batting surfaces and back their batsmen to drown their opposition in big hitting. They suddenly have a vulnerability.It’s not impossible that, by the end of this English summer, Kuldeep will have lost his potency. Something similar happened with Laxman Sivaramakrishnan in 1984-85. After claiming six wickets in each innings of the first Test of that series against England (in Mumbai) to help India to victory, he gradually became less potent as the batsmen learned to pick – or at least negate – his leg-spin. After 12 wickets in that first Test, he claimed seven in the second and then just four more in the next three Tests at a cost of over 100 apiece as England fought back to win the series. The career trajectories of Paul Adams – another left-arm wristspinner – and Ajantha Mendis – who was more of an offspinner with an almost unique action – were similar.Those examples should give England hope. It shows that, if they give themselves time, the clouds of mystery part and batting against Kuldeep become easier. And although you could equally look at the example of Shane Warne or Murali – bowlers who tormented England (and many other teams, to be fair) throughout their careers – Kuldeep is significantly slower than most contemporary spinners (his average pace here was 48.1 mph), which might, in time, prove an issue.Ben Stokes takes a break between overs•Getty ImagesThere were signs that England were learning to play him during the T20 series. After his match-winning haul in the first game at Old Trafford where he claimed 5 for 24, England played him much better in the second match in Cardiff when he went wicketless. Concluding that he had, in essence, three deliveries – a leg-break that turns into the right-hander, a googly that turns away and a much quicker delivery that goes straight but at a pace of around 66mph – they resolved that, if they couldn’t pick him out of the hand, they could play back more often and adjust off the pitch.Kuldeep – and his captain – responded brilliantly here. By posting a leg slip, they prevented England from either attempting to sweep or simply turning the leg-break behind square into the leg side. It robbed them of both a defensive and run-scoring option. Apparently reluctant to come down the wicket, it left them almost strokeless.Might England accept struggling against Kuldeep for a Test or two this summer if it means they are familiar with him by the time the World Cup comes round? Whatever the answer, there is, perhaps, a case for India hiding him from England again until the Test series or, perhaps, the World Cup. Yes, there is ample footage of him already out there. But there isn’t much evidence to suggest England have benefitted from that footage so far. It might be relevant, too, that he didn’t bowl one of his quicker deliveries in this match. He might, already, be keeping a couple of secrets up his sleeve.It would be a mistake to dismiss this experience against an unusual bowler as an aberration, though. There have been too many examples against spinners of all varieties to suggest Kuldeep has a unique ability to trouble England. Remember Mehedi Hasan (the offspinner who derailed England in Bangladesh), Lloyd Pope (the legspinner who derailed England U19 in New Zealand, or Jomel Warrican (the left-arm spinner who derailed England Lions in the Caribbean). Even here, Suresh Raina – admittedly benefitting from the inroads made by Kuldeep – delivered 14 dot ball in his 18 deliveries. It’s not one style or one surface that bothers England. It’s good spin bowling.So, what can England learn from the past? Well, on that 1984-85 tour of India they finally found a way to combat Sivaramakrishnan. But that England team contained batmen such as Mike Gatting, David Gower, Graeme Fowler and Tim Robinson (one of the umpires in this match) who had spent their formative years learning their trade in a county game that seemed to value spin bowling far more that it does presently.And that brings us back where we started. Conditions in English cricket will generally mean that young players are exposed less to spin bowling than they are to seam and swing. It may well always be an area of potential weakness.But, over the last decade or so, the situation has deteriorated. As older, specialist spinners have been squeezed out of the game and younger, all-rounders have focused on white-ball skills, as counties have struggled to provide opportunities for their talented young spinners in first-class cricket, as surfaces and fixtures lists and bat sizes and boundaries have all conspired against the spinner, the art has suffered in England.There is talent out there among young spinners, for sure, but it struggles for opportunity. And, as a result, young batsmen grow up without the skills or coping strategies to know how to combat such bowling. Playing The 100 in a window in high summer will make it even worse.England’s long-term strategy – prioritising white-ball cricket in the belief that success in that format will bring in a new audience and new riches – could, ironically, be undermined by their lack of investment in the first-class game. And no amount of off-field spin – which, to be fair, English cricket is much better at – will change that.

Benny Howell: Gloucestershire's magical mystery man

The story of a lad who overcame ADHD to become an unclassifiable bowler who’s one of the world’s best in T20

Jarrod Kimber25-Jul-2018Benny Howell is different. He knows it and his hair shows it. It’s a faux hawk in his natural colour, but with a bleached blond streak on one side of the peak, kind of in the crease where the mohawk meets his closely shaved head. Like it’s supposed to be one thing and ended up another.That is what Howell is. He’s supposed to be a batsman who bowled a bit of medium pace. Instead, he’s perhaps the most interesting bowler in the world: a medium-paced spinning pitcher.”I’m a bit different than a normal bloke. I’m a bit everywhere.”***In 2005, Howell made 66 for Hampshire 2nds as a 16-year-old. It took him five years to make the 1st XI. He was an opener and Hampshire had a top order of Jimmy Adams, Michael Carberry, John Crawley, Michael Lumb and Kevin Pietersen.There were no 1st XI games for the first two seasons. In his third season, in 2010, he played two List A games. The next season he played regularly. He even made his first-class debut, a 71 as opener after following on.Howell played 13 T20 and 13 List A matches for Hampshire. He didn’t bowl much in the List A games, but he averaged 44 with a strike rate of 92. In the T20s he floated around the lower middle-order, and with limited opportunity averaged 30 with the bat and 18 with the ball. At the end of that season they let him go.”I made a few mistakes, I had a few issues with time,” he remembered. “It was the end of the season. I decided to go on holiday without asking the coaches. I was getting frustrated with not playing, so I was probably lashing out a bit. At the time I didn’t think it was wrong.”With a record like his, it should have been easy for Howell to find another team. But the county rumour mill said he was challenging and more trouble than he was worth.In the 2011 off-season Dave Fulton, a former Kent captain, and an agent at the time, took on Howell to help him find a new county. No one showed much interest. Fulton called John Bracewell, then coach of Gloucestershire, and they agreed that if Howell turned up for pre-season, he’d get a trial. Howell would have to cut his contract with Melbourne grade cricket team Essendon, which he was willing to do.The only problem was that every call Fulton put in to Bracewell after Howell had booked to come home early went unanswered. Howell struggled with the uncertainty. “My head wasn’t great then. Before that I was pretty confident I was going to get somewhere. It was pretty obnoxious of me. They bred us in Hampshire to be confident.”

The easy thing for Howell would have been to rely on his batting, and chip in a few overs when circumstances called. He chose to make himself into a kind of bowler who hadn’t existed before

Fulton came up with another plan. In March 2012 he drove to Southampton to pick up Howell and took him to Oxford, where Gloucestershire were playing a practice game.”We get there, and I see John Bracewell doing some paperwork sitting on the bench,” Fulton remembered. “Gloucestershire are batting, so I pick the phone up to call, and I see him pick the phone up, think for a bit, and then put the phone down and carry on with his paperwork. So I walk around the ground and say ‘Hello John.'”‘Oh hello Fults, you just phoned me?'”‘I think we both know I did.'”Bracewell admitted that since their first call, he’d found out the county had no money.”It’s okay, he’ll play for nothing,” Fulton said. “He’ll crash on someone’s floor. He just wants an opportunity.”Howell spoke up. “I want to play for Gloucester, I feel I’m good enough. Will you give me a go?”Bracewell did.Fulton was nervous before Howell’s first game.”You become like Jerry Maguire, where you’re watching it and going ‘Come on’, and his first game in the 2nds he got nought and one, and you go ‘Grrrr.'”Howell felt worse. “I didn’t know where to go from there. I was pretty down.”He opened in the next game against Surrey and made 207 not out. He never had to sleep on anyone’s floor again, and by July he had a contract.***These days when bowlers warm up, coaches stand behind the rubber stumps with a baseball glove. For coaches, most bowlers in the world are straightforward. Occasionally on practice pitches with inconsistent bounce, balls get past them, and other times the ball will hit the stump and veer off. Howell isn’t a straightforward bowler.Today the coach is standing two metres back from the stumps and some balls bounce twice, others kick up, and one just seems to roll after pitching. And Howell is so accurate he hits the stumps more than most. It feels for a whole session that the coach doesn’t take one cleanly. And it isn’t as if the coach hasn’t seen slower balls. It’s Ian Harvey, possibly the best deliverer of slower balls in the ’90s.To confuse someone as experienced as Harvey, you can’t bowl normal. Howell could have been a standard medium-pacer with a few cutters and a back-of-the-hand slower ball – a poor man’s Harvey. But he chose something else, and it’s because of baseball.Howell (right) left Melbourne grade-cricket side Essendon for Gloucestershire, saying he’d play for free and sleep on people’s floors if needed•Harry Trump/Getty ImagesOn holiday in America a few years ago, Howell went to a Miami Marlins v Philadelphia Phillies game. He became obsessed with the duel between pitcher and batter. When he went back to one of his regular stints in Melbourne district cricket, he decided to play baseball for Malvern Braves, a small amateur club. He played centerfield to start, and would come in as a relief pitcher towards the end. It changed everything.”I loved the idea of a knuckleball, a curveball, so I played around with it. I thought, why not use it in cricket? No one was using it [the knuckleball]. That’s when my bowling took off.”The knuckleball became my main change-up. It was doing things that people hadn’t seen before.”This was before Andrew Tye started taking over the world. Until then, Howell had been a batsman; these deliveries turned him into a white-ball allrounder.***Howell doesn’t have just a knuckleball, he has one he rolls off the end of his thumb, making it rotate . Another is a wobble ball, and one that sometimes acts like an in- or outswinger.”I was looking at all the clips of the different pitchers. I liked the look of a screwball, the way it drifts in, like a legcutter, but sometimes skids on, or it might hold. Instead of bowling just a standard offcutter, which I don’t think is that valuable these days, I try to hold it like an offspinner and bowl offspin.”The commentators are always saying I bowl cutters – no, I don’t. I also bowl barrel balls [which is when an offspinner bowls around the side: a ball might skid on or hold].”As I was going on, I was seeing what works, because obviously a few pitches don’t work because the ball has to bounce. And the cricket ball doesn’t do as much as a baseball in the air. And then I started working out how to hold knuckleballs differently, how to drift the right way.”The majority of slower balls in cricket are offcutters, back-of-the-hand, or split-fingered. Howell uses none of these. He’s working on a back-of-the-hand slower ball, but even then it’s something different. It sounds like Abdul Qadir’s great finger wrong’un, where instead of coming out from the palm of the hand, it is flicked out quickly from between the thumb and index finger.Baseball doesn’t have spinners. But they do talk about spin. They measure baseball pitches with a spin rate: imparting spin allows them to move the ball more in the air. This is the Magnus effect – how balls from spinners drift and drop.Baseball techniques have been used in cricket before. Fred Spofforth studied baseball to master his swerve. Glenn McGrath, over 100 years later, had a lot of success with the split-finger slower ball – baseball’s splitter.But the reason Howell is using them is also because of how similar T20 is to baseball. Batsmen now come harder more often, and working the ball around is far less important than hitting it for six. A wicket is not valued as much in T20 as in longer forms. The contest now is much closer to the kill-or-be-killed nature of baseball.

It feels like I have a million thoughts going on in my head. I can’t put a mark on what I am confused about. It just feels like everything is a bit muddled, jumbled up in my brain

The primary contest has always been the same: if you can consistently deceive the batter, you’ll be more successful. In baseball they focus on the curve of these variation pitches as much as on the lack of pace. In cricket, Howell recently told the podcast, “we talk too much about the changing speed. It’s actually about the movement of slower balls as well”.If you look at great slower-ball bowlers, they often beat batsmen through dip, or eventually, spin. Lasith Malinga’s economy for full tosses was better than when most bowlers landed the ball because many of his full tosses were slower balls with incredible late dip. (Howell has experimented with Malinga’s low-arm action, because of course he has.) His pace doesn’t change as much as that of others, but he’s trying to beat you with movement, bounce and drop.Howell loved baseball so much, he thought about quitting cricket and trying to make it in the minor leagues. Many cricketers are obsessed with baseball. When Howell talks about it, he often mixes its terms up with those of cricket. He is a pitching obsessive. Recently he claimed to the that he has 50 slower balls. Fifty – from those that are match-ready to those he is experimenting with on his own.He is mostly referred to as a medium – or generously – a medium-fast seamer. He’s not that at all. “I call myself more of a spinner. I wanted to push myself to be a bit different.”He’s not a spinner either. He’s different.****”I’m a bit different than a normal bloke. I’m a bit everywhere”.There’s a nervous energy to Howell when he speaks, like he’s not sure if he has said the right thing but really hopes he has. In cricket, people gossip a lot and they say he has autism. It’s not true, but these things stick.In 2015, as England were getting dumped out of the World Cup, Howell tweeted: “Right time to perform for @Gloscricket as there is an @ECB_cricket place to be had.” The tweet only got five retweets and 11 likes, though if you ask around, people in the game noted it.”Everyone thinks those things, but others don’t act on every single emotion they have. That is what I have worked on to control. When I was a kid, I was diagnosed with ADHD, and then I sort of forgot about it. And then at the end of [the] Hampshire [stint], I was diagnosed with depression, but I didn’t feel like it was depression, I just felt confused. So I read a few things, and ADHD sounded about right, because I was doing things that are impulsive, I was getting confused, not thinking straight. I would say things without even thinking about it.”When he was at Gloucestershire he was diagnosed officially and sought help. “Medication, and actually more meditation, in fact. I do a lot of meditating to help me to be a bit more clearer, and not so jumpy on each sort of thought I have.”It feels like I have a million thoughts going on in my head. I can’t put a mark on what I am confused about. It just feels like everything is a bit muddled, jumbled up in my brain.”Selling the drama: Howell unfurls one of his celebrations•Getty ImagesThere are many athletes around the world with ADHD, including Michael Phelps. Some have talked about it as something to overcome and others as something that helps them. Either way, it certainly gives these athletes a point of difference in how they view the world and sport.It’s very hard to be an innovator in professional sport because everyone has arrived at the top level doing things the one way. In basketball the underhand free throw is far more accurate than the standard way, yet players are embarrassed to try it. The broomstick putter and metal drivers in golf were not instantly taken up, despite huge advantages. The easy thing for Howell would have been to rely on his batting, and chip in a few overs when circumstances called. He chose to make himself into a kind of bowler who hadn’t existed before.”I think if I didn’t have ADHD I wouldn’t have experimented with all my variations. I jump on things, I’m impulsive. But it’s helped my game.”I don’t think people knew what I was doing for a couple of years, maybe until a year or two ago. I was just having fun. People thought I was a bit crazy.”***In 2013 he took T20 wickets at an average of 23 and an economy of 7.24. In 2014 the average was 19.60, the economy 7.24; the next year, 22.17 and 7.25; then 17.44 and 6.65; and last year, 14.88 and 5.95 (all but six matches in the Blast).Howell has got better the teams have seen him. Even as teams have scored less off him, he continues to take wickets. Unlike players with similar records, like Sunil Narine and Rashid Khan, teams don’t really play around him and look for singles. Howell thinks they are starting to do that, but he has a theory on why they haven’t so far. “There is still an element of ‘he’s a medium-pacer, we should try and take him down’, which is fair enough, but it comes to my advantage.”People kill to face gentle medium pace. Medium-pace bowlers have been dying a slow-medium death in cricket since the war. Fast bowlers are in every team, so there are few medium-fast bowlers at the top level, let alone medium. Those who are medium-paced are almost never specialists. Fewer still are front-line bowlers.That is a big reason Howell has a career. Now, if he batted 11 and couldn’t physically hold a bat in his hands, he’d still be close to the first name on Gloucestershire’s team sheet.There are a growing number of slower-bowling specialists in T20. Tye is their current rock star, but Dwayne Bravo is their spiritual leader. In the last three years, Bravo, Tye and Thisara Perera are first, third and 11th on the T20 wickets list. These three medium-fast bowlers (according to their ESPNcricinfo profiles) are three of the best wicket-takers in the world. But they are quicker than Howell – over 80mph and sometimes over 85. Howell would be lucky to break 75mph – he thinks high 70s. The others can bowl quick yorkers, surprise bouncers; Howell can do neither. He’s left with his change-ups and very friendly pace.Cricket used to have hybrid bowlers like Sydney Barnes, who some called a seamer and some a spinner. But since Derek Underwood, there has been no one even kind of similar to that. Howell is not sure what bowler he’s similar to.

Recently Howell claimed that he has 50 slower balls. Fifty – from those that are match-ready to those he is experimenting with on his own

“Ian Harvey, maybe, or there was a guy from New Zealand.” (He means Chris Harris.) Harvey was a standard medium-fast, quicker than Howell, with great slower balls, and Harris bowled legcutters. Howell’s not like them.***A former bowler was recently contracted by his board to look at some bowling prospects for all formats. Of the four, he liked two. The board told him they were both too slow and then asked what he thought of the others. He said they weren’t much good but they were fast. The board went with the faster bowlers.The eye test is still how most cricketers worldwide are picked. How do they ?Tye looks better than Howell because he’s taller, stronger, quicker, and in cricket parlance, hits the deck hard. He also plays in the BBL, a higher-quality league. That means people are willing to take a risk on him for international cricket, the IPL, and now, other competitions.One of those competitions is the Blast, where Tye played alongside Howell for Gloucestershire. Tye played 14 games in which both took a wicket every 16 balls (which is incredible). But Tye’s smart economy is 8.6 and Howell’s is 6.1. It is great, but it doesn’t mean Howell’s numbers will translate to overseas leagues.The only other league Howell has played in was the BPL. He travelled there against the direct advice of the PCA in 2016 because it was his first big shot. In two seasons he has played six games (curiously only one in the second season). In those games, he averaged 20 and his smart economy was 5.28.The other problem is how little he’s seen. He’s not in a big-market team and Blast games are rarely televised. This year his team had two televised games, the first of which was played when England were facing Croatia in the football World Cup semi-final. At times he plays Royal London (50-over) matches that are on TV as well, but his bowling isn’t as good there.Still, England has one of cricket’s most professional scouting networks. And Howell has been the best T20 bowler in England for five years. He has taken the second most wickets in the last five years of the Blast, has the seventh-best economy rate, and takes a wicket every 16 balls. For three out of the last six seasons, the Blast has had the highest run rate among the world’s T20 leagues, so Howell’s economy is impressive. He has bowled to some decent batsmen – Chris Gayle, Colin Ingram, Jesse Ryder, Eoin Morgan, Andre Russell, Kumar Sangakkara, Jason Roy, Richard Levi, Dwayne Bravo, Aaron Finch, Brendon McCullum, Sunil Narine, David Miller, Corey Anderson. He has taken Ravi Bopara three times in nine games, and Sam Billings three times in seven. But England haven’t come calling.”I’m not shocked I haven’t been picked up, but I am disappointed,” he said. “I’ve never played Lions. I know when they were looking at the T20 friendlies last year, I was one of the names that came up. Apparently my slower balls weren’t too different when they were looking through speed analysis. That’s what I’ve heard – not sure how true that is. They still see me as not quick enough – a seamer with change-ups – and they think at international level I’ll get hit.”If that is true, it’s a massive misunderstanding of what Howell does. If anyone deserves a chance to get hit at international level, it’s him.***Thisara Perera bowls in the Powerplay for Gloucestershire at Uxbridge. It’s clear that although Perera is a slower-ball bowler – especially at the death – he’s still more than quick enough. Howell replaces Perera and the keeper comes straight up to the stumps.Howell has two first-class hundreds, but now, even if his batting was rubbish, he’d be close to being the first name on Gloucestershire’s team sheet•Getty ImagesLike for spinners the world over, Howell’s first over is the one straight after the Powerplay ends. He’s wearing the number 13. His first ball is full and straight and for all his alternative methods, he likes the “if you miss, I hit” mantra. They steal a second run off his first ball, and Howell gets struck on the fingers from the throw. There’s just a touch of the prima donna about his reaction. The over is a collection of balls hit hard to fielders and mishits that bobble off the bat safely.Howell’s wickets are off floating balls that come off the bat impossibly slowly and loop up in the air. There are no attacking fielders for one of the best T20 wicket-takers – everyone is back on the edge of the circle or boundary. At long-on, a mishit by John Simpson that never looks like going over the rope is taken. Howell seems to have a pre-planned wicket celebration and then adds a second one that doesn’t quite match. Both of them seem to be from ’80s comedy movies no one can remember.His next ball is to Dwayne Bravo, who pushes nervously back down the wicket. It should be stopped, but as Howell tries, he sort of folds over on himself. At first it doesn’t look like a significant problem and he gets up and walks back to his mark, but his limp gets worse. He stops and stretches before continuing to walk, limping again, starting and stopping, limping a few times. It’s long and dramatic. Everyone knows he won’t be able to bowl, but Howell keeps trying to get himself right, trying to prove he can overcome whatever it is. It’s a real injury, and he’ll be out for a couple of weeks.Howell has only bowled 11 balls, but in that time he has bamboozled top-order players, shown his hair to the crowd, covered the ball up like it’s a state secret, wrung his hands like a finger has been detached, celebrated a wicket with at least one, if not two, pre-planned celebrations, and then limped around one ball after his wicket. It has been dramatic, captivating and very different.***Slower balls lose their effectiveness. Cutters are smashed out of parks in club cricket now. Players see a ball coming above their eyeline and know it’s a back-of-the-hand slower ball. You see bowlers have a good season or year, when the slower balls can’t be picked, before struggling for a while when word gets around on how to pick them.Howell has got better the more people have faced him; he doesn’t have a few slower balls, he has a never-ending collection of deliveries to confuse batsmen, all while struggling with his own confusion.When you ask him about his ADHD, he says: “If you could imagine an old room full of stuff that hasn’t been used in 20 years, cobwebs, dust, things everywhere, that’s what my brain was. I was like that, a bit strange, a bit different.”It’s an answer you can tell he has used before. He was asked a question, and he went into that old room full of stuff and came out with the exact right answer for this situation. The same old room of stuff that’s also full of 50 slower balls.Benny Howell is a bit different from a normal cricketer. He’s a different bowler from almost everyone in T20.

How Chennai Super Kings can change history

Historical odds are against Super Kings as they take on Mumbai for the fourth time in an IPL final, having lost two of those and all three matches this season

Deivarayan Muthu in Hyderabad11-May-2019Here we go again.Mumbai Indians v Chennai Super Kings in an IPL final.If that feels familiar, it’s because they’ve already been here three times, and long story short, the Wankhede stadium had to make room for two extra trophies.Mumbai are clearly Super Kings’ bogey team, so much that they got on the nerves of the usually uber-cool Stephen Fleming. After watching his team being rolled over for 109 last month – their lowest total at Chepauk, the head coach arrived late to the press conference and his frustrated look suggested it was because he’d been busy giving the players a dressing down during one of those rare CSK team meetings.Mumbai beat them again in the first qualifier and they had to take the Visakhapatnam detour to earn another crack at Rohit Sharma’s men.But now that they’re here, what can they do to change history?Whatever it takes…Go hard at the top or bump up DhoniSuper Kings will be enthused by fifties from Faf du Plessis and Shane Watson in the second qualifier against Delhi Capitals. But, despite that, they are still the slowest scoring team in the Powerplay in IPL 2019, going at only 6.29 runs an over in this phase while also losing the most wickets (29).ALSO READ: Big match, high stakes? Better call Faf
.Mumbai usually reserve their gun bowler Jasprit Bumrah for MS Dhoni in the end overs, considering the quick’s exceptional head-to-head record against the Super Kings captain – three wickets for 47 runs in 46 balls in the IPL.In the first qualifier at Chepauk, Super Kings dawdled to 32 for 3 in the Powerplay and banked on Dhoni to tee off in the slog, and although he launched Lasith Malinga for back-to-back sixes, Bumrah muzzled Dhoni, again, with his assortment of yorkers and slower variations.Faf du Plessis and Shane Watson gave CSK a solid start•BCCISo, perhaps, there is a case for Watson and du Plessis to ditch their go-slow at the top approach in the Powerplay. Alternatively, Dhoni could promote himself up the order and look to take down Mumbai’s other bowling options rather than being cornered by Bumrah at the death. How about some more chaos theories?An attack-first approach. Whatever it takes…Unleash spin on Rohit and de KockOf the five times Quinton de Kock and Rohit have both gone unscathed in the Powerplay in IPL 2019, Mumbai have won four times this season. When one of them falls inside the Powerplay, which has happened nine times, Mumbai have lost four matches.Both the Mumbai openers prefer pace on the ball. The Hyderabad track tends to assist the seamers, but Super Kings could go against the grain and bowl spin from both ends with the new ball. Rohit and de Kock have been dismissed by spin six times each and glaringly the South African’s strike-rate drops to 97.22 against spin as opposed to 151.9 against pace.
Rohit, meanwhile, has struck at 123.7 against spin as opposed to 132.4 against pace. Suryakumar Yadav, Mumbai’s previous match-winner, too, has had a hard time against spin, particularly legspin, having been dismissed six times while managing 130 off 102 balls against this variety. Over to you Imran Tahir (or Karn Sharma).Spin to win. Whatever it takes…Who will be Dhoni’s bike?In the first qualifier on a dry, gripping Chepauk pitch, Mumbai swapped Mitchell McClenaghan for an offspinner in Jayant Yadav, and he did his job by getting rid of the left-handed Suresh Raina.In the second qualifier against Capitals, Dhoni left out M Vijay for a sixth-bowling option in Shardul Thakur. You all know Dhoni doesn’t like to ride all his bikes at the same time. Shardul ended up bowling just one over on Friday and doesn’t offer enough batting insurance in the lower order. Could Karn Sharma be Dhoni’s bike in this IPL final, like he was last season?Dhoni picked Karn ahead of Harbhajan, despite the presence of three left-handers in Sunrisers’ top five, and the legspinner took the prized scalp of Kane Williamson while conceding 25 in this three overs.Karn Sharma bowls•BCCIKarn has a reputation of stepping up in big games. In 2017 as well, he had replaced Harbhajan in a knockout, this time for Mumbai, and put them in the final. He is also a handy lower-order batsman who strikes at nearly 125 in T20s.
Mumbai will have their match-ups ready, but Dhoni needs to find his bike and take it out for a spin. Whatever it takes…Hold on to the catchesSuper Kings will play their second knockout game in three days – not to mention the travel in between that will have taken a toll on already slow-moving legs. On the other hand, Mumbai have enjoyed a four-day break and Rohit even found time to visit the Tirupati temple.Super Kings’ slow-moving legs were in the spotlight, again, in the first qualifier when M Vijay dropped Suryakumar on 11 and Watson dropped Ishan Kishan on 2. They then put on a merry old 80-run partnership that powered Mumbai into the final.Since Dhoni prefers having du Plessis and Ravindra Jadeja in the outfield to take those pressure catches, the less athletic men often find themselves inside the 30-yard circle and history will remind them to be more vigilant.In the 2008 IPL final, Raina dropped Yusuf Pathan on 13, and the batsman proceeded to slam an unbeaten 59 to seal the title for Rajasthan Royals.Just hold on to the catches. Whatever it takes…

India's bowling brothers in arms

Deepak and Rahul Chahar, on the verge of playing together for the country, talk about coming up in the game together

Interview by Saurabh Somani02-Aug-2019They were born within three days of each other, seven years apart. They are as close to being siblings as it is possible to be without actually being brothers: their fathers are brothers; their mothers are sisters. Fast bowler Deepak Chahar and legspinner Rahul Chahar are cousins twice over, who grew up together in houses facing each other, and for whom Lokendrasingh Chahar, Deepak’s father, had the same dream: that they would play for India one day.The two have been at opposing ends of the IPL’s fiercest rivalry, Mumbai Indians v Chennai Super Kings. The 2018 tournament catapulted Deepak into the reckoning for a place in the national side, while Rahul’s steady progress through the ranks has continued apace. Cut to India’s tour of the West Indies tour in 2019, where they are part of the T20I squad, and might feature together in one (or more) of the three games. We spoke to the two during the last domestic season for a freewheeling chat.What are you memories of playing together in childhood?
Deepak: We didn’t play together much. When I started playing [with a leather ball], I was 12 years old, and he was just five. Initially my family was in Suratgarh, a town near Ganganagar [in Rajasthan]. My father was in the Air Force. We made practice wickets at home. When Papa retired, we came to Agra, and he got one turf pitch and a cement pitch made. From then I started playing more seriously, and that’s where he [Rahul] also started.We are cousins, but we are like brothers. Even the blood group in our family is the same for everyone – A positive!Back then did you ever think you would be playing together at the highest levels?
Deepak: Since the day I held a cricket ball I’ve been thinking of playing for India, and when he held the ball, that’s what he thought too – that we’re going to play together for India. These are all just steps on the way – the Ranji Trophy and other tournaments.Papa always taught us to aim big. For Rahul, Papa always tells him, “You are a bowler who can take 300-400 wickets for India.”ALSO READ: Cousins, team-mates, rivals – the Chahar v Chahar story Rahul, how did you get into cricket? Did you watch Deepak play and want to be like him?
Rahul: Well, there were nets right in front of the house, so I used to just go for timepass. But when [Dad’s older brother] saw that I had some talent with legspin, he had the same dream for me [as he had for Deepak] and my interest in cricket also grew. Plus, I wasn’t that good in studies.Deepak: That went in his favour! ()In Agra, there were some high-profile tournaments, where Ranji cricketers would also play, which had cash prizes of a lakh. I played those very late, after I had already played Under-15s. But he got to play these at nine years old. In one such match, when he was ten, our team was hit for 210 runs [in 20 overs], but he bowled four overs and took 3 for 10. He got two of the Ranji cricketers also out. I don’t remember their names, but they had played Ranji. And he got them at the age of ten!And from the time I’ve seen him, he has always performed. He has been among the highest wicket-takers at district level, at age-group levels. It hasn’t ever happened that he hasn’t been among the wickets, even at India U-19 or U-23. His graph has been very good. Deepak, was the 2018 IPL the turning point of your career?
Deepak: I had the belief always that when I get to play all 14 matches in an IPL season, I will play for the country. You can only play 14 matches if you are doing well, and if you play that many, you can show all your skills. So that was my target.Then the India call-up happened and I needed to show that I could do well there. The IPL helps a lot. Indian cricket being so much ahead of the others has a lot to do with the IPL. When I made my India debut, I had already bowled to some of those players and done well, so that was a confidence boost.”Mahi [Dhoni] is among those people who will back you fully. He won’t change his decision after just one or two matches”•BCCIWhen did you get to know you would be playing in the IPL?
Deepak: Mahi [MS Dhoni] was in Pune [Rising Pune Supergiant] for two years. He had faith in me. In the first year itself, he told me I would get to play, but unfortunately I got injured in the very first practice match. So I could play only the last two-three matches.Next year, [Steven] Smith was the captain, and his plans were different, so I played only two-three matches. But Mahi had told me he’d take me in Chennai [Super Kings] and to prepare well. So I had the belief that I will get chances. And Mahi is among those people who will back you fully. He won’t change his decision after just one or two matches. I knew that I would get at least five-six matches.And he told me later, I think before the qualifier or the final, that in their initial planning talks he had said, “This guy will play all 14 matches, so let’s talk of the others.” He had that belief in me. And if Mahendra Singh Dhoni can believe in me so much, it gave me a reason to believe in my own abilities. That is his greatness – he gives players confidence. If someone like him says, “This guy is good and he’ll do well’, the player will also feel that he belongs at that level.And how was it being picked for India?
Deepak: I thought that when I got picked for India I would yell and shout and celebrate. It happened because Jasprit Bumrah was injured. I was playing for India A that time [in England] and doing well. MSK Prasad sir told me of my selection over breakfast one morning, but also said, “Don’t tell anybody.” So my excitement stayed inside, since it wasn’t yet officially announced. But obviously I felt very happy. The first person I told was Papa.When Deepak first played for India, what was the feeling at home?
Rahul: I wasn’t at home then, I was in England. But at home, there were being beaten, everyone was dancing. Rahul, when you get selected for India, who will you tell first?
Rahul: He’s the coach, he’s the guru, so he deserves to know first.Do you ever use each other as sounding boards?
Deepak: That’s Papa’s role.Rahul: is there. If [Deepak] spots anything that I need to do, then he also calls me.Is there competition between you when you’re playing for Rajasthan? “He has taken two wickets, so I should take three?”
Rahul: No, nothing like that.Deepak: We’re happy whoever takes the wickets. Maybe if we were closer in age, there might have been a rivalry, but the age difference is too large.Rahul: always tells us that our family is half the bowling attack of the team, so together we have to take five of the ten wickets. If he takes all five, Tauji will say, “Our sons have taken five.” And he says the same if I have taken five.ALSO READ: Deepak Chahar, from CSK’s Powerplay specialist to death-overs saviourDescribe the feeling of playing for India, Deepak?
Deepak: I was achieving a dream I had had for 15 years. Actually two dreams. I had always wanted to bowl 145kph and play for India. And in that match I bowled 145kph too.When I made my Ranji Trophy debut I was very slow – around 125kph. The period in the middle when I had injuries also came about because I made a big effort to become a 140kph bowler. It is a very difficult task. Many bowlers start at 140kph and come down to 125kph.How did you do it?
Deepak: Lots of training. Changed my diet. I was vegetarian, but started eating non-veg too. Changed my lifestyle and my bowling action.You have to make a huge effort, and you have to have time. If you have those two, it’s possible to go from 125 to 140. When I decided, I was 19 years old, so I knew that I could [afford to] have a couple of bad years. But if someone who is 25 years old decides to become quicker, it might be difficult.Bhuvneshwar Kumar did it.
Deepak: Bhuvneshwar might be the only one who has done it. He’s very smart, and he increased his workload with a lot of thought. He could increase his speed without changing his action. I had to change mine, because my action wasn’t that good for bowling fast. It was good for getting swing but not for bowling quick. I changed a lot of things to ensure that I can bowl at 140kph but still get swing.Rahul, do you remember Deepak’s Ranji debut, where he took 8 for 10?

Rahul: I was at home then. We were practising and had put his phone to charge. When he went inside to check his phone, we suddenly heard him yell, “Yeahhhh.” We stopped practice and went home, and sweets were distributed to everyone. I was too young then, so I didn’t have the courage to talk to him about the achievement.What was it like to walk into the Rajasthan dressing room knowing Deepak was already there?
Rahul: It makes a difference. He has seen me since childhood, and there was someone to show me the ropes. The biggest advantage of having him around is that if there is a problem with my bowling, he’ll pick it up and tell me. Because of him, the seniors in the team already knew me, so I didn’t feel as intimidated.Deepak, how was having Rahul in the team?
Deepak: He has had a big advantage. Generally what happens in the Ranji Trophy is, there’s a lot of politics. I learned this late. We are the kind who speak our minds. I suffered a lot due to politicking after my first two years. I learned a lot there. The advantage he has is, this hasn’t happened to him. And it can’t happen too, because now I’m one of the senior players in the team, so people can’t go against him.Rahul Chahar bowls for India Under-19s in England in 2017•Sarah Ansell/Getty ImagesWhat politics?
Deepak: It happens in every team. There was a period of four years where I never got the new ball for Rajasthan. I’ve played as the fourth medium-pacer for two years. I can’t really tell you all about whatever went down, but there have been matches where the team bowled 110 overs, of which I was given just five.I’m a new-ball bowler. I’ve bowled with the new ball for India, I bowl with the new ball in the IPL – but for Rajasthan I was bowling fourth! So there is a question mark somewhere – either on the team management or whoever was taking decisions.I was also in and out of the team. Obviously your performance will suffer. You play me as a fourth bowler but expect my performance to be as it was earlier – of course it won’t happen. It can’t happen with any bowler. I would get chances on spinning tracks, and not get into the XI on green tracks. One bad performance and I would be out. When there is a sword hanging over your head, it’s difficult for a player to perform.It changed after last year because I did well in the IPL. Then everyone thought they can’t touch me.Rahul, are you normally this quiet, or is it because Deepak is here?
Rahul: It’s because my big brother’s sitting here. () Since childhood I don’t speak too much in front of elders, so…Deepak: It’s our family culture. We’ve been taught since childhood to respect elders. Not just in the family but even outside. Respect someone who’s older, no matter who they are, whether your coach, your team-mate, the guy who sweeps floors.Rahul, your domestic season has been a good one. Forty-one wickets in the Ranji Trophy, playing in a pace-dominated attack, and a successful IPL with Mumbai Indians. What went right in the Ranji Trophy this year?

Rahul: ()Deepak: I’ll tell you. He’s a wicket-taking bowler. If you give him more overs to bowl, he’ll take wickets. He’s a leggie but bowls it quick through the air. He might concede runs, but he’s going to get you wickets for sure. If he bowls 25-30 overs against any side, he can take five wickets against them.This year he got the freedom to do that. We [Rajasthan] have no spinners, so he got a long run. And in the first innings of the season, he got to bowl a lot of overs and took five wickets. And his confidence kept building.Like my debut – in my first game I got eight wickets, so my confidence was very high, and it didn’t used to matter which batsman was in front of me. Now, with experience, I do think about which batsman is there and his strengths and weaknesses. Now [Rahul] also knows that even if he has a bad day, he’s the one who’s going to get the ball when we need a spinner. He has proved himself and the team has faith in him. The fact that he’s taking that responsibility at this age is a big thing. If your team believes in you, you also believe in yourself. When did you feel proudest of Rahul?
Deepak: I’ve told him this. He bowled an over to Gautam [Gambhir] last year [in the final of the Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy of 2017-18]. The way he bowled – it was in the Powerplay and we had already been hit for some 40-50 runs. He bowled a maiden, and got him out too. He couldn’t read any of his balls, and [Gambhir] has been among the best batsmen against spinners. If you can bowl like that to such a player, it shows you belong to that level.During the Ranji Trophy quarter-final against Karnataka, Rahul dropped a catch off your bowling. You said that you yourself had never dropped a catch off him.
Deepak: I have told him, “The next time you drop one, you’re going to get whacked on the ground itself.”Rahul: I hadn’t dropped a single catch this season, and the first one I dropped was off his bowling.Deepak: And look at my record – he’s been bowling for so many years, I haven’t dropped a single catch off him. Even at slip.So is Rahul going to face any more consequences for that drop?
Rahul: He’s going to belt me!

Game
Register
Service
Bonus